• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹壁强度:一项比较保留肌肉的 TRAM 皮瓣供区并发症与腹成形术影响的配对分析。

Abdominal wall strength: a matched-pair analysis comparing muscle-sparing TRAM flap donor-site morbidity with the effects of abdominoplasty.

机构信息

Freiburg, Germany; and Palo Alto, Calif. From the Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, and Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1454-1459. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef904b.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef904b
PMID:21042101
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction has evolved significantly over the last three decades. The muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), deep inferior epigastric artery perforator, and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps have been developed to minimize abdominal donor-site morbidity. Assuming that harvest of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap has the same impact on abdominal wall morbidity as performing an abdominoplasty, the authors designed a matched-pair analysis comparing patients' abdominal wall strength after muscle-sparing TRAM flap reconstruction with that after abdominoplasty.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients were included in the study. Fifty-two TRAM flap patients were matched with 52 abdominoplasty patients for age and body mass index. Outcome measures included postoperative complications, particularly hernia and abdominal bulge formation. Two surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction as well as the impact of the procedure on everyday life.

RESULTS

Both study groups were similar with regard to age, body mass index, past medical history, and postoperative complication rate, including hernia and abdominal bulge formation. Results were similar between the study groups, with the exception of a higher rate of satisfaction with the appearance of the abdominal scar among TRAM flap patients (p=0.03) as well a lower likelihood of TRAM flap patients to engaging in sporting activities postoperatively (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the muscle-sparing TRAM flap did not result in a higher rate of postoperative complications related to abdominal wall morbidity. Differences observed regarding the postoperative level of activity are unlikely to be related to the surgical insult to the abdominal wall.

摘要

背景

显微自体乳房重建在过去三十年中发生了重大变化。为了最大限度地减少腹部供区的发病率,开发了保留肌肉的横形腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)、腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁浅动脉皮瓣。假设腹壁浅动脉皮瓣的采集对腹壁发病率的影响与进行腹部整形术相同,作者设计了一项配对分析,比较了保留肌肉的 TRAM 皮瓣重建后和腹部整形术后患者腹壁强度。

方法

共有 104 例患者纳入本研究。52 例 TRAM 皮瓣患者与 52 例腹部整形患者按年龄和体重指数匹配。结果测量包括术后并发症,特别是疝和腹部膨出的形成。使用两项调查评估患者满意度以及该手术对日常生活的影响。

结果

两组患者在年龄、体重指数、既往病史和术后并发症发生率(包括疝和腹部膨出)方面相似。两组患者的结果相似,但 TRAM 皮瓣患者对腹部疤痕外观的满意度较高(p=0.03),以及术后 TRAM 皮瓣患者更有可能从事体育活动(p=0.01)。

结论

在本研究中,保留肌肉的 TRAM 皮瓣不会导致与腹壁发病率相关的术后并发症发生率更高。观察到的术后活动水平的差异不太可能与对腹壁的手术损伤有关。

相似文献

1
Abdominal wall strength: a matched-pair analysis comparing muscle-sparing TRAM flap donor-site morbidity with the effects of abdominoplasty.腹壁强度:一项比较保留肌肉的 TRAM 皮瓣供区并发症与腹成形术影响的配对分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1454-1459. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef904b.
2
Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.网片在游离 TRAM 皮瓣和保留肌肉的游离 TRAM 皮瓣供区修复中的应用,其腹部并发症发生率与 DIEP 皮瓣重建相当。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):367-374. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1b7e.
3
A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?腹直肌肌皮瓣游离(TRAM)与穿支皮瓣游离(SIEA)的头对头比较:腹壁功能的获益是否值得增加皮瓣的失活率?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug;122(2):348-355. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d60b0.
4
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肥胖对采用保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣进行乳房重建术后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
5
A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction.一项前瞻性研究比较了 SIEA、DIEP 和保留肌肉的游离 TRAM 皮瓣对腹壁的功能影响:第二部分。双侧重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1438-1453. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ea42ed.
6
Abdominal donor-site outcomes for medial versus lateral deep inferior epigastric artery branch perforator harvest.腹部供区结局比较:内侧与外侧腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣游离移植。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2198-2205. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131caf.
7
Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣乳房重建:与横行腹直肌肌皮瓣及腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣的前瞻性比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135328.88101.53.
8
Patient-Reported Abdominal Morbidity Following Abdomen-Based Breast Reconstruction.患者报告的基于腹部的乳房重建术后腹部发病率
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024 Jun;40(5):363-370. doi: 10.1055/a-2199-4151. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
9
A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. unilateral reconstruction.一项前瞻性研究比较了 SIEA、DIEP 和肌皮游离 TRAM 皮瓣对腹壁的功能影响:第 I 部分。单侧重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1142-1153. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f02520.
10
Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.双蒂腹壁下深动脉穿支/保留肌肉的横行腹直肌肌皮瓣用于单侧乳房重建。
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Apr;58(4):359-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000239818.28900.81.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Tissue Expander Technology Enable Early Targeted Intervention in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.组织扩张器技术的进展使胸前区乳房重建能够进行早期靶向干预。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e3781. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003781. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Abdominal Flap-based Breast Reconstruction versus Abdominoplasty: The Impact of Surgical Procedure on Scar Location.基于腹壁皮瓣的乳房重建术与腹壁成形术:手术方式对瘢痕位置的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Sep 24;8(9):e3112. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003112. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction.
基于扩张器的乳房重建中设备创新对临床结果的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Dec 24;7(12):e2524. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002524. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
The TRAM dam design: a new method for treatment of an enterocele.TRAM 悬带设计:一种治疗肠膨出的新方法。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Apr;16(2):157-60. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0791-4. Epub 2011 Nov 29.