Suppr超能文献

NMDA 受体拮抗剂治疗神经性疼痛。

NMDA receptor antagonists for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2010 Nov;11(11):1726-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00981.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor has been proposed as a primary target for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The aim of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of (individual) NMDA receptor antagonists on neuropathic pain, and the response (sensitivity) of individual neuropathic pain disorders to NMDA receptor antagonist therapy.

DESIGN

PubMed (including MEDLINE), EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched up to October 26, 2009 for randomized placebo controlled trials (RCTs) on neuropathic pain. The methodological quality of the included trials was independently assessed by two authors using the Delphi list. Fixed or random effects model were used to calculate the summary effect size using Hedges' g.

SETTING

NA.

PATIENTS

The patients used for the study were neuropathic pain patients.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions used were NMDA receptor antagonists.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The outcome of measurements was the reduction of spontaneous pain.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included, meeting the inclusion criteria. Summary effect sizes were calculated for subgroups of studies evaluating ketamine IV in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), oral memantine in postherptic neuralgia and, respectively, ketamine IV, and oral memantine in postamputation pain. Treatment with ketamine significantly reduced pain in postamputation pain (pooled summary effect size: -1.18 [confidence interval (CI) 95% -1.98, -0.37], P = 0.004). No significant effect on pain reduction could be established for ketamine IV in CRPS (-0.65 [CI 95% -1.47, 0.16], P = 0.11) oral memantine in postherptic neuralgia (0.03 [CI 95% -0.51, 0.56], P = 0.92) and for oral memantine in postamputation pain (0.38 [CI 95% -0.21, 0.98], P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this systematic review, no conclusions can yet be made about the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists on neuropathic pain. Additional RCTs in homogenous groups of pain patients are needed to explore the therapeutic potential of NMDA receptor antagonists in neuropathic pain.

摘要

目的

N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体被认为是治疗神经性疼痛的主要靶点。本研究的目的是进行一项荟萃分析,评估(个体)NMDA 受体拮抗剂对神经性疼痛的影响,以及个体神经性疼痛障碍对 NMDA 受体拮抗剂治疗的反应(敏感性)。

设计

截至 2009 年 10 月 26 日,通过 PubMed(包括 MEDLINE)、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 检索了针对神经性疼痛的随机安慰剂对照试验(RCT)。两名作者使用 Delphi 清单独立评估纳入试验的方法学质量。使用固定或随机效应模型,使用 Hedges'g 计算汇总效应大小。

设置

无。

患者

用于研究的患者为神经性疼痛患者。

干预措施

使用的干预措施为 NMDA 受体拮抗剂。

测量结果

测量的结果是自发性疼痛的减轻。

结果

共纳入 28 项符合纳入标准的研究。分别评估氯胺酮 IV 在复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)、口服美金刚在后疱疹性神经痛以及氯胺酮 IV 和口服美金刚在后截肢痛中的研究亚组计算了汇总效应大小。氯胺酮治疗显著减轻了截肢后疼痛(汇总效应大小:-1.18[95%置信区间(CI)95%-1.98,-0.37],P=0.004)。氯胺酮 IV 对 CRPS 中的疼痛减轻无显著影响(-0.65[CI 95%-1.47,0.16],P=0.11),口服美金刚在后疱疹性神经痛中的疼痛减轻无显著影响(0.03[CI 95%-0.51,0.56],P=0.92),口服美金刚在后截肢痛中的疼痛减轻无显著影响(0.38[CI 95%-0.21,0.98],P=0.21)。

结论

基于这项系统评价,目前还不能得出 NMDA 受体拮抗剂对神经性疼痛疗效的结论。需要在同质疼痛患者群体中开展更多的 RCT,以探索 NMDA 受体拮抗剂在神经性疼痛中的治疗潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验