• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当两棵树开战的时候。

When two trees go to war.

机构信息

University of Canterbury, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2011 Jan 21;269(1):245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.032
PMID:21044634
Abstract

Rooted phylogenetic networks are used to model non-treelike evolutionary histories. Such networks are often constructed by combining trees, clusters, triplets or characters into a single network that in some well-defined sense simultaneously represents them all. We review these four models and investigate how they are related. Motivated by the parsimony principle, one often aims to construct a network that contains as few reticulations (non-treelike evolutionary events) as possible. In general, the model chosen influences the minimum number of reticulation events required. However, when one obtains the input data from two binary (i.e. fully resolved) trees, we show that the minimum number of reticulations is independent of the model. The number of reticulations necessary to represent the trees, triplets, clusters (in the softwired sense) and characters (with unrestricted multiple crossover recombination) are all equal. Furthermore, we show that these results also hold when not the number of reticulations but the level of the constructed network is minimised. We use these unification results to settle several computational complexity questions that have been open in the field for some time. We also give explicit examples to show that already for data obtained from three binary trees the models begin to diverge.

摘要

有根进化网络被用于模拟非树状进化历史。这些网络通常通过将树、聚类、三元组或字符组合成一个单一的网络来构建,在某种明确定义的意义上同时代表它们。我们回顾了这四个模型,并研究了它们之间的关系。受简约原则的启发,人们通常旨在构建一个包含尽可能少的网状进化事件(非树状进化事件)的网络。一般来说,所选的模型会影响所需的最少网状进化事件数量。然而,当从两棵二叉树(即完全解析)中获得输入数据时,我们证明了所需的网状进化事件数量与模型无关。表示树、三元组、聚类(在软连线意义上)和字符(具有不受限制的多次交叉重组)所需的网状进化事件数量都是相等的。此外,我们还证明了这些结果在不是网状进化事件数量而是构建网络的级别最小化的情况下也成立。我们利用这些统一的结果解决了该领域一段时间以来悬而未决的几个计算复杂性问题。我们还给出了具体的例子,以表明即使是从三棵二叉树获得的数据,模型也开始出现分歧。

相似文献

1
When two trees go to war.当两棵树开战的时候。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Jan 21;269(1):245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
2
On the elusiveness of clusters.集群的难以捉摸性。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2012;9(2):517-34. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2011.128. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
3
Bounding the Softwired Parsimony Score of a Phylogenetic Network.对系统发生网络的软布线简约得分进行限定。
Bull Math Biol. 2024 Aug 22;86(10):121. doi: 10.1007/s11538-024-01350-9.
4
Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.系统发育网络在进化研究中的应用。
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):254-67. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
5
Netcombin: An algorithm for constructing optimal phylogenetic network from rooted triplets.Netcombin:一种从有根三分图构建最优系统发生网络的算法。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0227842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227842. eCollection 2020.
6
A Resolution of the Static Formulation Question for the Problem of Computing the History Bound.关于计算历史边界问题的静态公式化问题的一个解决方案
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017 Mar-Apr;14(2):404-417. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2016.2527645. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Analytic solutions of maximum likelihood on forks of four taxa.四个分类单元分支上最大似然法的解析解。
Math Biosci. 2007 Aug;208(2):347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.04.001.
8
Tripartitions do not always discriminate phylogenetic networks.三分法并不总是能区分系统发育网络。
Math Biosci. 2008 Feb;211(2):356-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2007.11.003. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
9
A fully resolved consensus between fully resolved phylogenetic trees.完全解析的系统发育树之间的完全解析的共识。
Genet Mol Res. 2006 Mar 31;5(1):269-83.
10
Uniqueness, intractability and exact algorithms: reflections on level-k phylogenetic networks.独特性、难解性与精确算法:关于k级系统发育网络的思考
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2009 Aug;7(4):597-623. doi: 10.1142/s0219720009004308.

引用本文的文献

1
In the light of deep coalescence: revisiting trees within networks.鉴于深度合并:重新审视网络中的树
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Nov 11;17(Suppl 14):415. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1269-1.
2
On the challenge of reconstructing level-1 phylogenetic networks from triplets and clusters.关于从三元组和聚类中重建一级系统发育网络的挑战。
J Math Biol. 2017 Jun;74(7):1729-1751. doi: 10.1007/s00285-016-1068-3. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
On the fixed parameter tractability of agreement-based phylogenetic distances.基于一致性的系统发育距离的固定参数可处理性
J Math Biol. 2017 Jan;74(1-2):239-257. doi: 10.1007/s00285-016-1023-3. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks.三元网络编码树子和二级系统发育网络。
J Math Biol. 2014 Jun;68(7):1707-29. doi: 10.1007/s00285-013-0683-5. Epub 2013 May 17.