• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在评价依维莫司洗脱驱动冠状动脉支架在治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验的长期随访中:ENDEAVOR II 研究的 5 年结果。

Long-term follow-up of the randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting driver coronary stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions: five year outcomes in the ENDEAVOR II study.

机构信息

Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2010 Nov;6(5):562-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I5A95.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV6I5A95
PMID:21044908
Abstract

AIMS

We report here the final 5-year follow-up results from the ENDEAVOR II trial, which was the first randomised trial evaluating the Endeavor(tm) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) compared with a bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with single, de novo coronary artery lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eligible patients were randomised 1:1 to receive ZES or BMS and were followed by telephone or clinic visit up to five years. We evaluated TVF and its components (target vessel revascularisation [TVR], Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction, or cardiac death attributed to the target vessel) at five years. Additionally, we report rates of MACE, TLR, and stent thrombosis (protocol- and ARC-defined) through five years. ENDEAVOR II enrolled 1,197 patients (598 ZES, 599 BMS). At five years of follow-up, the rates of TVF (15.4% vs 24.4%), TVR (10.7% vs 20.1%), MACE (15.4% vs 24.6%), and TLR (7.5% vs 16.3%) remained significantly lower in ZES patients compared with BMS patients. ARC definite and probable very late (>1 year) stent thrombosis remained low (0.2% ZES and 0.3% BMS) through five years.

CONCLUSIONS

After five years of follow-up, ZES demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes with sustained safety compared with BMS in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease.

摘要

目的

我们在此报告 ENDEAVOR II 试验的最终 5 年随访结果,该试验是首次评估 Endeavor(tm) 佐他莫司洗脱支架(ZES)与裸金属支架(BMS)在单支、新发冠状动脉病变患者中的疗效的随机试验。

方法和结果

符合条件的患者按 1:1 随机分为 ZES 组或 BMS 组,并通过电话或临床随访至 5 年。我们评估了 5 年时的 TVF 及其组成部分(靶血管血运重建[TVR]、Q 波或非 Q 波心肌梗死、或归因于靶血管的心脏死亡)。此外,我们报告了 5 年时的 MACE、TLR 和支架血栓形成(方案和 ARC 定义)的发生率。ENDEAVOR II 纳入了 1197 例患者(ZES 组 598 例,BMS 组 599 例)。5 年随访时,ZES 组的 TVF 发生率(15.4%比 24.4%)、TVR 发生率(10.7%比 20.1%)、MACE 发生率(15.4%比 24.6%)和 TLR 发生率(7.5%比 16.3%)均显著低于 BMS 组。5 年时 ARC 确定和可能的极晚期(>1 年)支架血栓形成仍较低(ZES 组 0.2%,BMS 组 0.3%)。

结论

在 5 年随访后,与 BMS 相比,ZES 为患有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的患者提供了显著改善的临床结果和持续的安全性。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up of the randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting driver coronary stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions: five year outcomes in the ENDEAVOR II study.在评价依维莫司洗脱驱动冠状动脉支架在治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验的长期随访中:ENDEAVOR II 研究的 5 年结果。
EuroIntervention. 2010 Nov;6(5):562-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6I5A95.
2
Long-term clinical and economic analysis of the Endeavor drug-eluting stent versus the Driver bare-metal stent: 4-year results from the ENDEAVOR II trial (Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).恩多雷药物洗脱支架与雷帕霉素洗脱依维莫司药物洗脱支架(Xience V)对比的 4 年临床与经济长期分析:来自 ENDEAVOR II 试验的结果(评价美敦力 AVE ABT-578 依维莫司洗脱驱动冠状动脉支架在初发原生冠状动脉病变中应用的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1178-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.011.
3
Impact of polymer formulations on neointimal proliferation after zotarolimus-eluting stent with different polymers: insights from the RESOLUTE trial.不同聚合物载药支架后新生内膜增殖的聚合物配方影响:来自 RESOLUTE 试验的观察。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(3):248-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957548. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后5年临床结局:来自4项比较西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架的随机试验患者水平汇总分析的见解
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 1;54(10):894-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.077.
5
Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最新进展:药物洗脱支架的演变,聚焦于XIENCE V药物洗脱支架。
Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328333f550.
6
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的随机对照比较:来自Xience V依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗初发原发性冠状动脉病变患者的临床评估(SPIRIT)III试验的两年临床随访
Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):680-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
7
Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Zotarolimus eluting stents to treat bifurcated lesions: a 7-month clinical outcome comparison.西罗莫司、他克莫司和佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗分叉病变:7个月临床结果比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):35-42.
8
Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.佐他莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗原发性冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.035. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
9
Firebird and cypher sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents in treatment of very long coronary lesions.火鸟和西罗莫司洗脱 Cypher 支架及裸金属支架治疗极长冠状动脉病变
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Aug 20;121(16):1518-23.
10
Rationale and design of the Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavor versus Cypher stenting Trial (PROTECT): randomized controlled trial comparing the incidence of stent thrombosis and clinical events after sirolimus or zotarolimus drug-eluting stent implantation.患者相关结局与 Endeavor 对比 Cypher 支架置入试验(PROTECT)的研究背景和设计:比较依维莫司或佐他莫司药物洗脱支架置入后支架血栓形成和临床事件发生率的随机对照试验。
Am Heart J. 2009 Dec;158(6):902-909.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Fabrication Technologies for the Development of Next-Generation Cardiovascular Stents.用于下一代心血管支架开发的制造技术进展
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Nov 10;14(11):544. doi: 10.3390/jfb14110544.
2
Seven-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with biodegradable polymer coated sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from a single-center real-world experience.接受生物可降解聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的七年临床结局:单中心真实世界经验结果
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S280-S284. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 26.
3
Safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents: An updated meta-analysis and regression of 9 randomized clinical trials.
第二代药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架相比的安全性和有效性:9项随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析与回归分析
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jan;41(1):151-158. doi: 10.1002/clc.22855. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
4
A higher colour grade yellow plaque was detected at one year after implantation of an everolimus-eluting stent than after a zotarolimus-eluting stent.与佐他莫司洗脱支架植入后相比,依维莫司洗脱支架植入一年后检测到更高颜色等级的黄色斑块。
Heart Asia. 2013 Sep 7;5(1):192-6. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2013-010378. eCollection 2013.
5
Clinical utility of platinum chromium bare-metal stents in coronary heart disease.铂铬合金裸金属支架在冠心病中的临床应用价值
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Aug 27;8:359-67. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S69415. eCollection 2015.
6
Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world: 8-year follow-up.药物洗脱支架在现实世界中的疗效与安全性:8年随访
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Sep;103(3):174-82. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140110. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
Advances in stent technologies and their effect on clinical efficacy and safety.支架技术的进展及其对临床疗效和安全性的影响。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jun 3;7:165-78. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S31869. eCollection 2014.
8
Use of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction with persistent ST-segment elevation: results of the ALKK PCI-registry.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者应用药物洗脱支架:ALKK PCI 注册研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 May;103(5):373-80. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0664-8. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Experience with BioMatrix BES and other DES in all-comers setting: a retrospective overview.BioMatrix BES及其他药物洗脱支架在所有患者中的应用经验:一项回顾性综述。
Indian Heart J. 2013 Dec;65(6):678-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Neointimal coverage and vasodilator response to titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents and everolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BASE-ACS trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中氧化钛氮涂层生物活性支架和依维莫司洗脱支架的新生内膜覆盖率和血管扩张反应:来自 BASE-ACS 试验的见解。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;29(8):1693-703. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0285-8. Epub 2013 Aug 31.