Suppr超能文献

甲状腺乳头状癌:外科医生应从细针穿刺细胞学报告中读取多少信息?

Papillary thyroid carcinoma: how much should the surgeon read from fine needle aspiration cytology reports?

作者信息

Das Dilip K, Sheikh Mehraj, Mallik Mrinmay K, Sharma Prem N, Mannan Abul A S R, Sheikh Zafar A, Haji Bahia I, George Shirly S, Madda John P, Hussein Sundus, Francis Issam M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Center for Research, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait.

出版信息

Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010 Oct-Dec;53(4):686-91. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.72032.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

During routine fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), a number of cases are diagnosed as suspicious; or it is suggested that PTC or a neoplasm be ruled out by histopathology. Since these diagnostic labels are likely to put the clinicians in a difficult situation while planning the management, this study aims to find out how much the surgeon should read from these reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups. Group A included 38 cases diagnosed as PTC or suspicious of PTC. Group B included 40 cases in which it was suggested that PTC/a neoplasm to be ruled out and non-neoplastic lesions with one or more cytologic features of PTC. The two groups were compared with clinical, imaging and cytomorphologic features.

RESULTS

A significant difference was observed with respect to age between Group A and Group B (P<0.001). The frequency of the following five cytologic features was significantly higher in Group A: papillary formation (P<0.001), psammoma bodies (P=0.054), fine nuclear chromatin (P=0.010), frequent nuclear grooves (P<0.001) and intra-nuclear cytoplasmic inclusion (P<0.001). Three or more of the five cytologic features were also reported in significantly higher number of Group A cases (P<0.001). Majority (81.8%) of the cases with subsequent histology in Group A were confirmed as PTC as opposed to 7.7% in Group B (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, cases with definitive cytodiagnosis of PTC and suggestive of PTC (Group A) should be taken much more seriously by the surgeons as compared to Group B cases.

摘要

目的

在甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的常规细针穿刺细胞诊断过程中,有一些病例被诊断为可疑;或者建议通过组织病理学排除PTC或肿瘤。由于这些诊断标签在制定治疗方案时可能会使临床医生陷入困境,本研究旨在找出外科医生应从这些报告中获取多少信息。

材料与方法

将患者分为两组。A组包括38例被诊断为PTC或疑似PTC的病例。B组包括40例建议排除PTC/肿瘤以及具有一个或多个PTC细胞学特征的非肿瘤性病变的病例。对两组的临床、影像学和细胞形态学特征进行比较。

结果

A组和B组在年龄方面存在显著差异(P<0.001)。以下五个细胞学特征在A组中的出现频率显著更高:乳头形成(P<0.001)、砂粒体(P=0.054)、细核染色质(P=0.010)、频繁的核沟(P<0.001)和核内假包涵体(P<0.001)。A组中也有显著更多的病例报告具有五个细胞学特征中的三个或更多(P<0.001)。A组中后续组织学检查的大多数病例(81.8%)被确认为PTC,而B组为7.7%(P<0.001)。

结论

因此,与B组病例相比,外科医生应更重视具有明确PTC细胞诊断和提示PTC的病例(A组)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验