• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学专业学生心理契约违背感测量工具

Instrument to measure psychological contract violation in pharmacy students.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Aug 10;74(6):107. doi: 10.5688/aj7406107.

DOI:10.5688/aj7406107
PMID:21045949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933016/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To adapt and evaluate an instrument that measures perceived psychological contract violations in pharmacy students by schools and colleges of pharmacy.

DESIGN

A psychological contract violations measure was developed from existing literature and the 1997 ACPE Guidelines and pilot-tested with second-year pharmacy students at 2 schools of pharmacy. A revised measure then was administered to second-year pharmacy students at 6 schools of pharmacy. Using a 5-point Likert-type scale, participants were asked to indicate the level of obligations they received compared to what was promised by the school of pharmacy.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis on the psychological contract violations measure was conducted using principal components analysis resulting in 7 factors, which led to a revised measure with 26 items. Using a sample of 339 students, the proposed 7-factor measurement model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. In general, the results supported the hypothesized model. The final 23-item scale demonstrated both reliability and validity. Some students perceived certain aspects of the psychological contract that exists with their school of pharmacy were being violated.

CONCLUSION

The psychological contract violations measure may serve as a valuable tool in helping to identify areas where their students believe that schools/colleges of pharmacy have not fulfilled promised obligations.

摘要

目的

改编并评估一种衡量药学院校学生感知到的心理契约违背的工具。

设计

从现有文献和 1997 年 ACPE 指南中开发出心理契约违背测量工具,并在两所药学院的二年级药学学生中进行试点测试。然后,将修订后的测量工具应用于六所药学院的二年级药学学生。参与者被要求使用 5 点李克特量表,表明他们收到的义务与药学院承诺的义务相比的水平。

结果

使用主成分分析对心理契约违背测量工具进行探索性因素分析,结果得出 7 个因素,这导致了一个包含 26 个项目的修订测量工具。使用 339 名学生的样本,使用验证性因子分析测试了拟议的 7 因素测量模型。总的来说,结果支持了假设模型。最终的 23 项量表显示出可靠性和有效性。一些学生认为与他们的药学院校存在的心理契约的某些方面被违反了。

结论

心理契约违背测量工具可以作为一种有价值的工具,帮助确定学生认为学校/药学院没有履行承诺义务的领域。

相似文献

1
Instrument to measure psychological contract violation in pharmacy students.药学专业学生心理契约违背感测量工具
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Aug 10;74(6):107. doi: 10.5688/aj7406107.
2
A Multi-School Validation of a Revised Scale for Assessing Cultural Competence in Pharmacy Students.多校联合验证修订版药学学生文化能力评估量表。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6602. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6602.
3
Professional technical standards in colleges and schools of pharmacy.高等学校药学类专业教学质量国家标准。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Apr 11;75(3):50. doi: 10.5688/ajpe75350.
4
Educating Pharmacy Students to Improve Quality (EPIQ) in colleges and schools of pharmacy.在药学院校中培养药学学生提高质量(EPIQ)。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):109. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766109.
5
Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy.药学院校的教学评估实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):103. doi: 10.5688/aj7306103.
6
Validation of an empathy scale in pharmacy and nursing students.药学和护理专业学生同理心量表的验证。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Jun 12;77(5):94. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77594.
7
Constructing and Validating Students' Psychological Contract Violation Scale.构建并验证学生心理契约违背量表
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:685468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685468. eCollection 2021.
8
Validation of a survey tool to assess the patient safety attitudes of pharmacy students.一种用于评估药学专业学生患者安全态度的调查工具的验证
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 10;5(9):e008442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008442.
9
Portfolio use and practices in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.美国药学院校的组合投资使用和实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Apr 10;76(3):46. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76346.
10
Motivations and Predictors of Cheating in Pharmacy School.药学院作弊行为的动机与预测因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Oct 25;80(8):133. doi: 10.5688/ajpe808133.

引用本文的文献

1
Internet Addiction and Academic Anxiety Among Chinese College Students During COVID-19: The Mediating Role of Psychological Contract.新冠疫情期间中国大学生的网络成瘾与学业焦虑:心理契约的中介作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Oct 3;16:3949-3962. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S428599. eCollection 2023.
2
Exploring Factors Affecting Graduate Students' Satisfaction toward E-Learning in the Era of the COVID-19 Crisis.探索新冠疫情危机时代影响研究生对电子学习满意度的因素。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Aug 15;12(8):1121-1142. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12080079.
3
Constructing and Validating Students' Psychological Contract Violation Scale.构建并验证学生心理契约违背量表
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:685468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685468. eCollection 2021.
4
Development and Validation of Psychological Contract Scale for Hospital Pharmacists.医院药剂师心理契约量表的编制与验证
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 2;13:1433-1442. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S270030. eCollection 2020.
5
Identifying psychological contract breaches to guide improvements in faculty recruitment, retention, and development.识别心理契约违背,以指导教师招聘、留任和发展的改进。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):108. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766108.
6
Use of laptops and other technology in the classroom.在课堂上使用笔记本电脑及其他技术设备。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Oct 11;74(8):152a.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an instrument to measure professionalism.一种用于衡量职业素养的工具的开发。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Aug 15;70(4):85. doi: 10.5688/aj700485.
2
White paper on pharmacy student professionalism. American Pharmaceutical Association Academy of Students of Pharmacy--American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Council of Deans Task Force on Professionalism.药学专业学生职业素养白皮书。美国药学协会药学院学生学会——美国药学院协会院长理事会职业素养特别工作组。
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Jan-Feb;40(1):96-102.
3
Medical students' early expectations and later opinions of aspects of their first year.医学生对其第一年各方面的早期期望和后期看法。
Acad Med. 1989 Sep;64(9):538-42.