Boyer Jeffrey S, Adams Brian
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.
Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:168-73.
Severe wrist arthritis is most commonly treated by complete wrist arthrodesis, which provides predictable pain relief but the loss of motion may reduce ease of function. In selected patients, motion preserving surgical options, including limited intercarpal fusion, proximal row carpectomy (PRC), and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) are considered. However, limited fusion and PRC are typically possible only in less severe cases in which there are some articular surfaces showing minimal degeneration that can be retained. TWA is an option for patients who have lower activity demands and specific needs or desires to maintain some wrist motion. Recent utility and decision analysis studies demonstrate that arthroplasty is associated with higher qualify adjusted life year (QALY) than arthrodesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Despite these positive aspects of TWA, the procedure is not as widely accepted as hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty. Early implants had problems related to both materials and design, with breakage, loosening and joint imbalance being common complications. Newer generation implants are improved with more predictable early function, less joint imbalance, and rare breakage, but distal component loosening remains a substantial problem. Thus, patients with poor bone stock and those with high activity demands are typically not candidates for TWA, and all patients are advised to restrict activities to reduce the risk of implant loosening. A new motion preserving procedure has recently been used at our institution in selected patients with severe arthritis who do not qualify for TWA but request an alternative to complete wrist fusion. In this procedure, a distal radius implant arthroplasty is combined with a PRC. The distal radius component of a Universal 2 (UNI 2) total wrist arthroplasty system (Integra life Sciences, Plainsboro, NJ) is used. To our knowledge, there have been no previous publications on this technique. We report our first two cases which have shown a satisfactory early outcome for pain relief and functional wrist motion.
重度腕关节炎最常见的治疗方法是全腕关节融合术,该方法能有效缓解疼痛,但关节活动丧失可能会降低功能的便利性。对于部分患者,可考虑采用保留运动功能的手术方案,包括有限的腕骨间融合术、近排腕骨切除术(PRC)和全腕关节置换术(TWA)。然而,有限融合术和PRC通常仅适用于病情较轻的病例,即部分关节面退变程度较轻且可保留的情况。TWA适用于活动需求较低且有特定需求或希望保留一定腕关节活动度的患者。近期的效用和决策分析研究表明,在类风湿性关节炎患者中,关节置换术比关节融合术能带来更高的质量调整生命年(QALY)。尽管TWA有这些积极方面,但该手术的接受程度不如髋、膝或肩关节置换术广泛。早期的植入物存在材料和设计方面的问题,断裂、松动和关节失衡是常见并发症。新一代植入物在早期功能更可预测、关节失衡更少且断裂罕见方面有所改进,但远端部件松动仍然是一个严重问题。因此,骨质不佳的患者和活动需求高的患者通常不适合TWA,所有患者都被建议限制活动以降低植入物松动的风险。最近,我们机构对一些不符合TWA条件但又希望替代全腕关节融合术的重度关节炎患者采用了一种新的保留运动功能的手术方法。在该手术中,桡骨远端植入物关节置换术与PRC相结合。使用了通用2型(UNI 2)全腕关节置换系统(Integra生命科学公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)的桡骨远端部件。据我们所知,此前尚无关于该技术的出版物。我们报告了首例两例病例,其早期疼痛缓解和腕关节功能运动结果令人满意。