• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心室辅助装置的过去、现在和未来监管方面。

Past, present, and future regulatory aspects of ventricular assist devices.

机构信息

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010 Dec;3(6):600-3. doi: 10.1007/s12265-010-9225-3. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12265-010-9225-3
PMID:21046301
Abstract

The development of ventricular assist devices (VADs) for the treatment of heart failure has been ongoing since the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) initiated the artificial heart program in 1964. The primary goal was to develop VADs and total artificial hearts for both temporary (short-term) and long-term use. Due to a small target population and the inability to blind patients and clinicians, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized the challenges of conducting trials with these invasive devices. In an effort to address those challenges, FDA has accepted a variety of clinical trial designs to collect the data required to evaluate safety and effectiveness data in different patient groups. This article will provide a detailed discussion of the past, present, and future FDA regulatory considerations for VADs.

摘要

自 1964 年美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)启动人工心脏计划以来,用于心力衰竭治疗的心室辅助装置(VAD)的开发一直在进行。主要目标是开发用于短期和长期使用的 VAD 和全人工心脏。由于目标人群较小,并且无法对患者和临床医生进行盲法,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)已经认识到使用这些侵入性装置进行试验的挑战。为了应对这些挑战,FDA 已经接受了各种临床试验设计,以收集评估不同患者群体的安全性和有效性数据所需的数据。本文将详细讨论过去、现在和未来 FDA 对 VAD 的监管考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Past, present, and future regulatory aspects of ventricular assist devices.心室辅助装置的过去、现在和未来监管方面。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010 Dec;3(6):600-3. doi: 10.1007/s12265-010-9225-3. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
2
Statement regarding the pre and post market assessment of durable, implantable ventricular assist devices in the United States: executive summary.关于美国耐用型、植入式心室辅助装置的上市前和上市后评估的声明:执行摘要。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):e163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.041. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
3
A US Food and Drug Administration perspective on cardiac resynchronization and ventricular assist device trials.美国食品药品监督管理局对心脏再同步化治疗及心室辅助装置试验的观点。
Congest Heart Fail. 2005 Jul-Aug;11(4):207-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2005.04620.x.
4
Statement regarding the pre and post market assessment of durable, implantable ventricular assist devices in the United States.关于美国耐用型、植入式心室辅助装置的上市前和上市后评估的声明。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):2147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.040. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
5
Progress versus precision: challenges in clinical trial design for left ventricular assist devices.进展与精准度:左心室辅助装置临床试验设计中的挑战
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.123.
6
FDA's perspectives on cardiovascular devices.FDA 对心血管器械的看法。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2009 Jun;2(2):143-6. doi: 10.1007/s12265-009-9096-7. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
7
FDA perspective on clinical trial design for cardiovascular devices.美国食品药品监督管理局对心血管器械临床试验设计的观点。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):773-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.044.
8
Japanese guidance for ventricular assist devices/total artificial hearts.日本心室辅助装置/全人工心脏指南。
Artif Organs. 2010 Sep;34(9):699-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01091.x.
9
Current options for mechanical heart technology.机械心脏技术的当前选择。
J Card Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;17(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb01225.x.
10
Advisory statement on clinical use of modified aortic endografts from the Society for Vascular Surgery®.血管外科学会®关于改良主动脉腔内移植物临床应用的咨询声明。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):832-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.026.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.终末期心力衰竭患者长期使用左心室辅助装置。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175.
2
Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation.HeartMate 通气式电动左心室辅助系统在等待心脏移植患者中的多中心临床评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Dec;122(6):1186-95. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.118274.
3
Device and patient management in a bridge-to-transplant setting.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3 Suppl):S98-102; discussion S114-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02618-7.
4
Morbidity and outcome after mechanical ventricular support using Thoratec, Novacor, and HeartMate for bridging to heart transplantation.
Artif Organs. 2000 Jun;24(6):421-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06621.x.
5
Results with the Novacor assist system and evaluation of long-term assistance.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Jul;18(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00427-9.
6
Novacor left ventricular assist system versus Heartmate vented electric left ventricular assist system as a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in bridging patients: a prospective study.诺瓦科尔左心室辅助系统与Heartmate通风电动左心室辅助系统作为桥接患者的长期机械循环支持装置的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Mar;119(3):581-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(00)70140-1.
7
Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.使用Thoratec心室辅助装置作为心脏移植桥梁的单心室和双心室支持患者的术前与术后比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Jan;113(1):202-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70416-1.