Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 22;278(1711):1572-80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1973. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
The balance of selection acting through different fitness components (e.g. fecundity, mating success, survival) determines the potential tempo and trajectory of adaptive evolution. Yet the extent to which the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection may vary among fitness components is poorly understood. Here, we compiled a database of 3978 linear selection coefficients from temporally replicated studies of selection in wild populations to address this question. Across studies, we find that multi-year selection through mating success and fecundity is stronger than selection through survival, but varies less in direction. We also report that selection through mating success varies more in long-term average strength than selection through either survival or fecundity. The consistency in direction and stronger long-term average strength of selection through mating success and fecundity suggests that selection through these fitness components should cause more persistent directional evolution relative to selection through survival. Similar patterns were apparent for the subset of studies that evaluated the temporal dynamics of selection on traits simultaneously using several different fitness components, but few such studies exist. Taken together, these results reveal key differences in the temporal dynamics of selection acting through different fitness components, but they also reveal important limitations in our understanding of how selection drives adaptive evolution.
选择在不同适应度组分(如繁殖力、交配成功率、存活率)上的平衡作用决定了适应性进化的潜在速度和轨迹。然而,适应度组分之间表型选择的时间动态在多大程度上存在差异,我们还知之甚少。在这里,我们汇编了一个包含 3978 个线性选择系数的数据库,这些系数来自于对野生种群中选择的时间重复研究,以解决这个问题。在这些研究中,我们发现,通过交配成功率和繁殖力进行多年的选择比通过存活率进行的选择更强,但方向变化较小。我们还报告说,通过交配成功率进行的选择在长期平均强度上的变化比通过存活率或繁殖力进行的选择更大。交配成功率和繁殖力选择的方向一致性和更强的长期平均强度表明,与通过存活率进行的选择相比,这些适应度组分的选择应该会导致更持久的定向进化。对于使用多个不同适应度组分同时评估选择对性状的时间动态的研究子集,也出现了类似的模式,但这样的研究很少。总的来说,这些结果揭示了不同适应度组分上选择的时间动态的关键差异,但也揭示了我们对选择如何驱动适应性进化的理解存在重要局限性。