Suppr超能文献

电话咨询卒中中心后静脉溶栓的依从性和安全性。

Protocol adherence and safety of intravenous thrombolysis after telephone consultation with a stroke center.

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Stroke Institute, Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;19(6):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.07.013. Epub 2010 Jun 17.

Abstract

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke must be provided in an appropriate setting. The best way to provide thrombolysis in small community hospitals remains uncertain. Medical records were reviewed of tPA treatments at a stroke center between January 2002 and October 2005. The stroke center provides phone consultation for acute stroke to smaller hospitals in the region. Subjects were classified into 3 groups: tPA started at referring hospitals before transfer (treat and transfer group), tPA started at the stroke center after transfer (transfer and treat group), and the control group of patients who presented directly to the stroke center and received tPA (stroke center group). We recorded the patient and treatment characteristics, protocol deviations, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and in-hospital deaths. There were 133 patients in the treat and transfer group, 35 patients in the transfer and treat group, and 86 patients in the stroke center group. Time from onset to treatment was similar in the treat and transfer and the stroke center groups, but the door-to-needle time was shorter by 12 minutes in the latter (P=.02). Fifty-five protocol deviations occurred in 38% patients in the treat and transfer group, compared with 6% in the stroke center group (P<.001). The most common deviations were related to time window violations and incorrect tPA dosing. Symptomatic ICH occurred in 8.2%, with no significant difference between the groups. Neither community hospital treatment nor protocol deviation was a predictor of symptomatic ICH or in-hospital mortality. Our findings indicate the need for improved protocol adherence for stroke thrombolysis in patients presenting to small community hospitals.

摘要

急性缺血性脑卒中患者需要在合适的环境下接受静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)治疗。在小型社区医院实施溶栓治疗的最佳方法仍不确定。

回顾了 2002 年 1 月至 2005 年 10 月期间卒中中心接受 tPA 治疗的患者病历。卒中中心为该地区的小型医院提供急性脑卒中电话咨询服务。患者被分为 3 组:在转诊医院开始 tPA 治疗(治疗-转院组)、在卒中中心开始 tPA 治疗(转院-治疗组)和直接到卒中中心接受 tPA 治疗的对照组(卒中中心组)。记录患者和治疗特征、方案偏差、症状性颅内出血(ICH)和住院内死亡率。治疗-转院组有 133 例患者,转院-治疗组有 35 例患者,卒中中心组有 86 例患者。治疗-转院组和卒中中心组从发病到治疗的时间相似,但卒中中心组的门到针时间缩短了 12 分钟(P=0.02)。治疗-转院组有 38%的患者发生 55 次方案偏差,而卒中中心组只有 6%(P<.001)。最常见的偏差与时间窗违反和 tPA 剂量不正确有关。症状性 ICH 发生率为 8.2%,各组之间无显著差异。社区医院的治疗或方案偏差均不是症状性 ICH 或住院内死亡率的预测因素。

我们的研究结果表明,需要提高小型社区医院患者接受脑卒中溶栓治疗的方案依从性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验