Division of Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8064, USA.
J Perinatol. 2011 Mar;31(3):206-11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.121. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
Owing to resident work-hour reductions and more permanent personnel in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU), we sought to determine if pediatric housestaff are missing learning opportunities in procedural training due to non-participation.
A prospective, observational study was conducted at an academic NICU using self-reported data from neonatal personnel after attempting 188 procedures on 109 neonates, and analyzed using Fisher's exact and χ (2)-tests.
Housestaff first attempted 32% of procedures (P<0.001) and were less likely to make attempts early in the academic year (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in attempts based on urgency of situation (P=0.742). Of procedures performed by non-housestaff personnel, 93% were completed while housestaff were present elsewhere in the unit.
Pediatric housestaff performed the minority of procedures in the NICU, even in non-urgent situations, and were often uninvolved in other procedures, representing missed learning opportunities.
由于住院医师工作时间减少和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中永久性人员的增加,我们试图确定儿科住院医师是否因不参与而错过程序性培训的学习机会。
一项前瞻性、观察性研究在一家学术性 NICU 进行,使用新生儿人员在对 109 名新生儿进行 188 次操作后的自我报告数据进行分析,采用 Fisher 精确检验和 χ ²检验。
住院医师首次尝试了 32%的操作(P<0.001),并且在学术年早期尝试的可能性较小(P<0.001)。根据情况的紧急程度,尝试的次数没有显著差异(P=0.742)。非住院医师人员完成的操作中,有 93%是在住院医师在病房其他地方时完成的。
儿科住院医师在 NICU 中仅完成了少数操作,即使在非紧急情况下,他们也经常不参与其他操作,这代表着错失了学习机会。