Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
J Perinatol. 2012 Dec;32(12):927-32. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.17. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
The objective of this study is to assess the opportunities afforded to and competence of pediatric residents in performing neonatal endotracheal intubations.
The records of all intubations performed on neonates over a 3-year period at a university-based birthing hospital were reviewed to assess the relationships between outcomes, types of providers and the setting of intubations.
A total of 785 attempts were made during 362 intubations. Pediatric residents were given the opportunity to intubate 38% of the cohort (n=137) and were successful on 21% of the attempts. Residents were more likely to perform intubation in the neonatal intensive care unit (vs delivery room; P<0.001), in non-emergency situations (P<0.001), and on older (P<0.001) and larger (P=0.07) infants.
Opportunities for residents to intubate neonates were few and their success rate was low. In the current care paradigm, it is doubtful if trainees can be sufficiently skilled in endotracheal intubation during residency. Residents that plan to pursue procedure-intensive subspecialties may benefit from other models for training.
本研究旨在评估儿科住院医师进行新生儿气管内插管的机会和能力。
回顾了一所大学附属分娩医院三年内所有新生儿插管的记录,以评估结果、提供者类型和插管环境之间的关系。
在 362 次插管中,共进行了 785 次尝试。儿科住院医师有机会对 38%的患儿(n=137)进行插管,成功率为 21%。住院医师更有可能在新生儿重症监护病房(vs 产房;P<0.001)、非紧急情况下(P<0.001),以及对年龄较大(P<0.001)和体型较大(P=0.07)的婴儿进行插管。
住院医师进行新生儿插管的机会很少,成功率很低。在当前的护理模式下,住院医师在住院期间是否能够熟练掌握气管内插管技术值得怀疑。计划从事以程序为重点的亚专科的住院医师可能会受益于其他培训模式。