• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fundamental performance comparison of a Hartmann and a shearing interferometer wave-front sensor.

作者信息

Welsh B M, Ellerbroek B L, Roggemann M C, Pennington T L

出版信息

Appl Opt. 1995 Jul 20;34(21):4186-95. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.004186.

DOI:10.1364/AO.34.004186
PMID:21052244
Abstract

The performance of ground-based optical imaging systems is severely degraded from the diffraction limit by the random effects of the atmosphere. Adaptive-optics techniques have been used to compensate for atmospheric-turbulence effects. A critical component in the adaptive-optics system is the wave-front sensor. At present, two types of sensors are common: the Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor and the shearing interferometer wave-front sensor. In this paper we make a direct performance comparison of these two sensors. The performance calculations are restricted to common configurations of these two sensors and the fundamental limits imposed by shot noise and atmospheric effects. These two effects encompass the effects of extended reference beacons and sensor subaperture spacings larger than the Fried parameter r(0). Our results indicate comparable performance for good seeing conditions and small beacons. However, for poor seeing conditions and extended beacons, the Hartmann sensor has lower error levels than the shearing interferometer.

摘要

相似文献

1
Fundamental performance comparison of a Hartmann and a shearing interferometer wave-front sensor.
Appl Opt. 1995 Jul 20;34(21):4186-95. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.004186.
2
Evaluation of the performance of a shearing interferometer in strong scintillation in the absence of additive measurement noise.
Appl Opt. 2002 Jun 20;41(18):3674-84. doi: 10.1364/ao.41.003674.
3
Performance analysis of the self-referenced speckle-holography image-reconstruction technique.自参考散斑全息图像重建技术的性能分析
Appl Opt. 1993 Sep 10;32(26):5071-8. doi: 10.1364/AO.32.005071.
4
Processing wave-front-sensor slope measurements using artificial neural networks.
Appl Opt. 1996 Jul 20;35(21):4238-51. doi: 10.1364/AO.35.004238.
5
Use of artificial neural networks for Hartmann-sensor lenslet centroid estimation.使用人工神经网络进行哈特曼传感器小透镜质心估计。
Appl Opt. 1996 Oct 10;35(29):5747-57. doi: 10.1364/AO.35.005747.
6
Fundamental performance of transverse wind estimator from Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor measurements.
Opt Express. 2018 Apr 30;26(9):11859-11876. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.011859.
7
Experimental comparison of a Shack-Hartmann sensor and a phase-shifting interferometer for large-optics metrology applications.
Appl Opt. 2000 Sep 1;39(25):4540-6. doi: 10.1364/ao.39.004540.
8
Wave-front sensing by pseudo-phase-conjugate interferometry.基于伪相位共轭干涉测量法的波前传感
Appl Opt. 1995 Jan 1;34(1):108-13. doi: 10.1364/AO.34.000108.
9
Mid-infrared Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor fully cryogenic using extended source for endoatmospheric applications.用于大气内应用的采用扩展光源的全低温中红外夏克-哈特曼波前传感器。
Opt Express. 2012 Jul 2;20(14):15636-53. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.015636.
10
Revisiting the comparison between the Shack-Hartmann and the pyramid wavefront sensors via the Fisher information matrix.通过费舍尔信息矩阵重新审视夏克-哈特曼传感器与金字塔波前传感器之间的比较。
Opt Express. 2015 Nov 2;23(22):28619-33. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.028619.

引用本文的文献

1
Maximum-likelihood methods in wavefront sensing: stochastic models and likelihood functions.波前传感中的最大似然方法:随机模型与似然函数
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007 Feb;24(2):391-414. doi: 10.1364/josaa.24.000391.