Cancer Education Center, Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Dec;21(12):2203-12. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9640-4. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
This study aimed to describe cancer screening rates for second primary cancer among cancer survivors in Korea, and to compare these rates with those of two control groups: individuals without a history of cancer but with other chronic diseases, and individuals without a history of cancer and without other chronic diseases.
The study is a cross-sectional analysis of 15,556 adults ≥ 30 years old who participated in the 2001, 2005, and 2007 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (KNHANES). The prevalence of breast, cervical, gastric, and colorectal cancer screening examinations according to national guidelines was assessed and compared to two control groups.
Screening rates among cancer survivors were 48.5, 54.7, 34.7, and 28.6% for breast, cervical, gastric, and colorectal cancer screening, respectively. Cancer survivors showed higher screening rates for all four cancer sites compared with both control groups, but breast cancer screening was only statistically significant after adjusting gender, age, marital status, education, income, working status, health insurance, smoking and drinking status, and self-reported health status.
Cancer survivors were more likely than individuals without a cancer history to obtain screening examinations according to recommended guidelines. Still, screening rates even among survivors were suboptimal, emphasizing the need for a more systematic approach to second primary cancer screening and prevention.
本研究旨在描述韩国癌症幸存者中第二原发癌的筛查率,并将这些率与两个对照组进行比较:有其他慢性疾病但无癌症病史的个体,以及无癌症和其他慢性疾病病史的个体。
本研究是对参加 2001、2005 和 2007 年韩国国家健康和营养检查调查(KNHANES)的 15556 名≥30 岁成年人进行的横断面分析。根据国家指南评估了乳腺癌、宫颈癌、胃癌和结直肠癌筛查检查的流行率,并与两个对照组进行了比较。
癌症幸存者的乳腺癌、宫颈癌、胃癌和结直肠癌筛查率分别为 48.5%、54.7%、34.7%和 28.6%。与两个对照组相比,癌症幸存者在所有四个癌症部位的筛查率均较高,但在调整性别、年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、收入、工作状况、医疗保险、吸烟和饮酒状况以及自我报告的健康状况后,仅乳腺癌筛查具有统计学意义。
与无癌症病史的个体相比,癌症幸存者更有可能根据推荐的指南进行筛查检查。然而,即使是幸存者的筛查率也不理想,这强调了需要更系统的方法来进行第二原发癌的筛查和预防。