Environmental Biodiversity and Biotechnology Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Biodegradation. 2011 Jun;22(3):585-92. doi: 10.1007/s10532-010-9431-3. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
This work aimed at evaluating the biodegradability of different bacterial surfactants in liquid medium and in soil microcosms. The biodegradability of biosurfactants by pure and mixed bacterial cultures was evaluated through CO(2) evolution. Three bacterial strains, Acinetobacter baumanni LBBMA ES11, Acinetobacter haemolyticus LBBMA 53 and Pseudomonas sp. LBBMA 101B, used the biosurfactants produced by Bacillus sp. LBBMA 111A (mixed lipopeptide), Bacillus subtilis LBBMA 155 (lipopeptide), Flavobacterium sp. LBBMA 168 (mixture of flavolipids), Dietzia Maris LBBMA 191(glycolipid) and Arthrobacter oxydans LBBMA 201(lipopeptide) as carbon sources in minimal medium. The synthetic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was also mineralized by these microorganisms, but at a lower rate. CO(2) emitted by a mixed bacterial culture in soil microcosms with biosurfactants was higher than in the microcosm containing SDS. Biosurfactant mineralization in soil was confirmed by the increase in surface tension of the soil aqueous extracts after incubation with the mixed bacterial culture. It can be concluded that, in terms of biodegradability and environmental security, these compounds are more suitable for applications in remediation technologies in comparison to synthetic surfactants. However, more information is needed on structure of biosurfactants, their interaction with soil and contaminants and scale up and cost for biosurfactant production.
本工作旨在评估不同细菌表面活性剂在液体介质和土壤微宇宙中的生物降解性。通过 CO2 释放评估纯菌和混合菌培养物中生物表面活性剂的生物降解性。三种细菌菌株,即鲍曼不动杆菌 LBBMA ES11、溶血不动杆菌 LBBMA 53 和假单胞菌 LBBMA 101B,利用 Bacillus sp. LBBMA 111A(混合脂肽)、枯草芽孢杆菌 LBBMA 155(脂肽)、黄杆菌 LBBMA 168(混合类脂)、Maris 节杆菌 LBBMA 191(糖脂)和氧化节杆菌 LBBMA 201(脂肽)产生的生物表面活性剂作为碳源在最小培养基中生长。这些微生物也能矿化合成表面活性剂十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS),但矿化速度较低。含有生物表面活性剂的土壤微宇宙中混合细菌培养物释放的 CO2 高于含有 SDS 的微宇宙。混合细菌培养物孵育后土壤水提物的表面张力增加,证实了生物表面活性剂在土壤中的矿化。可以得出结论,就生物降解性和环境安全性而言,与合成表面活性剂相比,这些化合物更适合应用于修复技术。然而,还需要更多关于生物表面活性剂结构、它们与土壤和污染物的相互作用以及生物表面活性剂生产的放大和成本的信息。