Varewijck A J, Goudzwaard J A, Brugts M P, Lamberts S W J, Hofland L J, Janssen J A M J L
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Growth Horm IGF Res. 2010 Dec;20(6):427-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
To investigate whether human insulin (HI) and insulin analogues differ in their ability to activate the human IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), the human insulin receptor A (IR-A) and the human insulin receptor B (IR-B) in vitro.
HI, short-acting insulin analogues (insulin aspart; insulin lispro) and long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine; insulin detemir) were compared by using kinase receptor activation (KIRA) bioassays specific for IGF-IR, IR-A or IR-B, respectively. These assays quantify ligand activity by measuring receptor auto-phosphorylation upon ligand binding. HI and insulin analogues were tested in a range from 0.1 to 100 nM.
Short-acting analogues: Overall, short-acting insulin analogues did not differ substantially from HI, nor from each other. Insulin lispro was slightly more potent than HI and insulin aspart in activating the IGF-IR, only reaching statistical significance at 100 nM (p<0.01). Long-acting analogues: At <10 nM insulin glargine was as potent as HI in activating the IRs and IGF-IR. At 10-100 nM insulin glargine was significantly more potent than HI in activating the IR-B (p<0.05) and IGF-IR (p<0.001). Insulin glargine was more potent than insulin detemir in activating all three receptors (p<0.001). Insulin detemir was less potent than HI in activating the IRs at 1-10 nM (p<0.01) and IGF-IR at >1 nM (p<0.05).
Insulin glargine was more potent in activating the IGF-IR than HI and insulin detemir. Since KIRA bioassays do not mimic the exact in vivo situation, further research is needed to find out whether our data have implications for clinical use of insulin glargine.
研究人胰岛素(HI)和胰岛素类似物在体外激活人胰岛素样生长因子-I受体(IGF-IR)、人胰岛素受体A(IR-A)和人胰岛素受体B(IR-B)的能力是否存在差异。
分别使用针对IGF-IR、IR-A或IR-B的激酶受体激活(KIRA)生物测定法比较HI、短效胰岛素类似物(门冬胰岛素;赖脯胰岛素)和长效胰岛素类似物(甘精胰岛素;地特胰岛素)。这些测定法通过测量配体结合后受体的自身磷酸化来量化配体活性。HI和胰岛素类似物在0.1至100 nM的范围内进行测试。
短效类似物:总体而言,短效胰岛素类似物与HI之间以及它们彼此之间没有实质性差异。赖脯胰岛素在激活IGF-IR方面比HI和门冬胰岛素略强,仅在100 nM时达到统计学显著性(p<0.01)。长效类似物:在<10 nM时,甘精胰岛素在激活胰岛素受体和IGF-IR方面与HI一样有效。在10-100 nM时,甘精胰岛素在激活IR-B(p<0.05)和IGF-IR(p<0.001)方面比HI显著更强。甘精胰岛素在激活所有三种受体方面比地特胰岛素更强(p<0.001)。在1-10 nM时,地特胰岛素在激活胰岛素受体方面比HI弱(p<0.01),在>1 nM时在激活IGF-IR方面比HI弱(p<0.05)。
甘精胰岛素在激活IGF-IR方面比HI和地特胰岛素更强。由于KIRA生物测定法不能模拟确切的体内情况,需要进一步研究以确定我们的数据对甘精胰岛素临床应用是否有影响。