Suppr超能文献

这个病人有疟疾吗?

Does this patient have malaria?

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2010 Nov 10;304(18):2048-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1578. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Malaria commonly infects residents of and travelers to tropical regions. The clinical features of infection are notoriously nonspecific but have not been comprehensively evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and synthesize data related to the predictive value of clinical findings for the diagnosis of malaria in endemic areas and in travelers returning from endemic areas.

DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, AND DATA EXTRACTION: The databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1950-July 2010) were searched to identify studies published in the English language of endemic and "imported" (acquired during travel) malaria. Additional studies were identified from reference lists. Studies were included that had patients suspected of having acute malaria (usually because of fever) and compared the presence or absence of clinical findings with blood smear confirmation. Two authors independently identified studies, appraised study quality, and extracted data on the patient population, outcome assessment, and clinical findings. Differences between reviewers were resolved by consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fourteen studies for endemic malaria were identified that met review criteria. Individual symptoms are of limited diagnostic utility but presence of splenomegaly (summary likelihood ratio [LR], 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-4.7) or hepatomegaly (summary LR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.6) make malaria more likely. Combinations of findings can affect the likelihood of malaria, but their performance varies by setting. Seven studies of imported malaria were identified. The presence of fever (LR, 5.1; 95% CI, 4.9-5.3), splenomegaly (summary LR, 6.5; 95% CI, 3.9-11.0), hyperbilirubinemia (LR, 7.3; 95% CI, 5.5-9.6), or thrombocytopenia (summary LR, 5.6; 95% CI, 4.1-7.5) make malaria more likely.

CONCLUSIONS

In endemic areas, the likelihood of malaria is increased by the presence of splenomegaly and hepatomegaly but individual findings are of limited utility and cannot reliably exclude malaria; combinations of findings may be useful to stratify risk in patients. In returning travelers, the clinical assessment can provide substantial diagnostic benefit, although all patients still require laboratory testing because malaria can be rapidly fatal.

摘要

背景

疟疾通常感染热带地区的居民和旅行者。感染的临床特征是众所周知的非特异性的,但还没有得到全面的评估。

目的

系统回顾和综合有关在流行地区和从流行地区返回的旅行者中,临床发现对疟疾诊断的预测价值的数据。

数据来源、研究选择和数据提取:检索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库(1950 年-2010 年 7 月),以确定用英文发表的有关地方性和“输入性”(在旅行期间获得)疟疾的研究。从参考文献列表中确定了其他研究。纳入了怀疑患有急性疟疾(通常因发热)的患者,并比较了临床发现的存在与否与血涂片确认的结果。两名作者独立确定研究、评估研究质量,并提取有关患者人群、结局评估和临床发现的数据。审查员之间的差异通过协商解决。

数据分析

确定了 14 项符合审查标准的地方性疟疾研究。个体症状的诊断价值有限,但脾肿大(汇总似然比[LR],3.3;95%置信区间[CI],2.0-4.7)或肝肿大(汇总 LR,2.4;95% CI,1.6-3.6)使疟疾更有可能。发现的组合可以影响疟疾的可能性,但它们的表现因环境而异。确定了 7 项输入性疟疾的研究。发热(LR,5.1;95% CI,4.9-5.3)、脾肿大(汇总 LR,6.5;95% CI,3.9-11.0)、高胆红素血症(LR,7.3;95% CI,5.5-9.6)或血小板减少症(LR,5.6;95% CI,4.1-7.5)使疟疾更有可能。

结论

在流行地区,脾肿大和肝肿大的存在增加了疟疾的可能性,但个体发现的实用性有限,不能可靠地排除疟疾;发现的组合可能有助于对患者进行风险分层。在返回的旅行者中,临床评估可以提供很大的诊断益处,尽管所有患者仍需进行实验室检测,因为疟疾可能迅速致命。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验