School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Ecology. 2010 Oct;91(10):2862-73. doi: 10.1890/09-0156.1.
Maternal effects are increasingly recognized as important drivers of population dynamics and determinants of evolutionary trajectories. Recently, there has been a proliferation of studies finding or citing a positive relationship between maternal size/age and offspring size or offspring quality. The relationship between maternal phenotype and offspring size is intriguing in that it is unclear why young mothers should produce offspring of inferior quality or fitness. Here we evaluate the underlying evolutionary pressures that may lead to a maternal size/age-offspring size correlation and consider the likelihood that such a correlation results in a positive relationship between the age or size of mothers and the fitness of their offspring. We find that, while there are a number of reasons why selection may favor the production of larger offspring by larger mothers, this change in size is more likely due to associated changes in the maternal phenotype that affect the offspring size-performance relationship. We did not find evidence that the offspring of older females should have intrinsically higher fitness. When we explored this issue theoretically, the only instance in which smaller mothers produce suboptimal offspring sizes is when a (largely unsupported) constraint on maximum offspring size is introduced into the model. It is clear that larger offspring fare better than smaller offspring when reared in the same environment, but this misses a critical point: different environments elicit selection for different optimal sizes of young. We suggest that caution should be exercised when interpreting the outcome of offspring-size experiments when offspring from different mothers are reared in a common environment, because this approach may remove the source of selection (e.g., reproducing in different context) that induced a shift in offspring size in the first place. It has been suggested that fish stocks should be managed to preserve these older age classes because larger mothers produce offspring with a greater chance of survival and subsequent recruitment. Overall, we suggest that, while there are clear and compelling reasons for preserving older females in exploited populations, there is little theoretical justification or evidence that older mothers produce offspring with higher per capita fitness than do younger mothers.
母体效应越来越被认为是种群动态的重要驱动因素和进化轨迹的决定因素。最近,越来越多的研究发现或引用了母体大小/年龄与后代大小或后代质量之间的正相关关系。母体表型与后代大小之间的关系很有趣,因为不清楚为什么年轻的母亲应该生育质量或适应性较差的后代。在这里,我们评估了可能导致母体大小/年龄与后代大小相关的潜在进化压力,并考虑了这种相关性导致母亲年龄或大小与后代适应性之间存在正相关关系的可能性。我们发现,虽然有许多原因可以解释为什么选择可能有利于更大的母亲生育更大的后代,但这种大小的变化更可能是由于与母体表型相关的变化,这些变化会影响后代的大小-表现关系。我们没有发现证据表明老年雌性的后代本身应该具有更高的适应性。当我们从理论上探讨这个问题时,只有在模型中引入对最大后代大小的(主要不支持的)限制时,较小的母亲才会产生次优的后代大小。显然,在相同的环境中养育时,较大的后代比较小的后代表现更好,但这忽略了一个关键要点:不同的环境会选择出不同的最佳幼体大小。我们建议,当在相同的环境中养育来自不同母亲的后代时,解释后代大小实验的结果应谨慎行事,因为这种方法可能会消除导致后代大小发生变化的选择源(例如,在不同的环境中繁殖)。有人建议,应该管理鱼类种群以保留这些较老的年龄组,因为较大的母亲生育的后代有更大的生存和随后招募的机会。总的来说,我们认为,虽然在受剥削的种群中保留较老的雌性有明确而令人信服的理由,但几乎没有理论依据或证据表明较老的母亲生育的后代比年轻的母亲具有更高的个体适应性。