School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, United Kingdom.
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):452-70. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365521.
Research stemming from self-categorization theory (Turner et al., 1987) has demonstrated that individuals are typically more persuaded by messages from their in-group than by messages from the out-group. The present research investigated the role of issue relevance in moderating these effects. In particular, it was predicted that in-groups would only be more persuasive when the dimension on which group membership was defined was meaningful or relevant to the attitude issue. In two studies, participants were presented with persuasive arguments from either an in-group source or an out-group source, where the basis of the in-group/out-group distinction was either relevant or irrelevant to the attitude issue. Participants' attitudes toward the issue were then measured. The results supported the predictions: Participants were more persuaded by in-group sources than out-group sources when the basis for defining the group was relevant to the attitude issue. However, when the defining characteristic of the group was irrelevant to the attitude issue, participants were equally persuaded by in-group and out-group sources. These results support the hypothesis that the fit between group membership and domain is an important moderator of self-categorization effects.
源自自我归类理论(Turner 等人,1987)的研究表明,个体通常更容易被来自内群体的信息说服,而不是来自外群体的信息。本研究探讨了问题相关性在调节这些影响中的作用。特别是,当定义群体成员身份的维度对态度问题有意义或相关时,内群体才更具说服力。在两项研究中,参与者接受了来自内群体来源或外群体来源的有说服力的论点,其中内群体/外群体的区别基础与态度问题相关或不相关。然后测量了参与者对这个问题的态度。结果支持了这些预测:当定义群体的基础与态度问题相关时,参与者更容易被内群体来源说服,而不是外群体来源。然而,当群体的定义特征与态度问题不相关时,参与者对内群体和外群体的来源同样信服。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即群体成员身份和领域之间的契合度是自我归类效应的一个重要调节因素。