Nowell Branda, Foster-Fishman Pennie
Department of Public Administration, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 8102, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA,
Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Dec;48(3-4):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9364-3.
While community collaboratives have emerged as a prominent vehicle for fostering a more coordinated community response to complex issues, research to date suggests that the success of these efforts at achieving community/population-level improvements is mixed. As a result, researchers and practitioners are increasing their focus on the intermediate outcomes accomplished by these entities. The purpose of this study is to expand upon this examination of potential intermediate outcomes by investigating the ways in which collaboratives strengthen the capacity of the organizations who participate as members. Utilizing a mixed methods design, we present an empirically-based framework of organizational outcomes associated with participation in a community collaborative. The dimensions of this framework are validated based on quantitative findings from representatives of 614 different organizations and agencies nested within 51 different community collaboratives. This article then explores how the characteristics of organizations and their representatives relate to the nature and type of impacts associated with membership. Based on study findings, we argue that community collaboratives can be effective interventions for strengthening organizational capacity across all sectors in ways that can promote greater community resiliency.
虽然社区合作组织已成为促进社区对复杂问题做出更协调反应的重要载体,但迄今为止的研究表明,这些努力在实现社区/人口层面改善方面的成效参差不齐。因此,研究人员和从业者越来越关注这些实体所取得的中间成果。本研究的目的是通过调查合作组织增强作为成员参与的组织能力的方式,来扩展对潜在中间成果的考察。利用混合方法设计,我们提出了一个基于实证的、与参与社区合作组织相关的组织成果框架。该框架的维度基于来自51个不同社区合作组织中的614个不同组织和机构代表的定量研究结果得到验证。本文接着探讨组织及其代表的特征如何与成员资格相关的影响的性质和类型相关。基于研究结果,我们认为社区合作组织可以成为有效的干预措施,以增强所有部门的组织能力,从而促进社区更强的复原力。