• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索个人和组织层面能力建设的促进因素和障碍:参与社区重点事项设定研讨会的成果。

Exploring facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational level capacity building: outcomes of participation in a community priority setting workshop.

机构信息

Centre for Health Promotion Studies, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 5-10 University Terrace, 8303-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2T4.

出版信息

Glob Health Promot. 2010 Jun;17(2):34-43. doi: 10.1177/1757975910365225.

DOI:10.1177/1757975910365225
PMID:20587629
Abstract

This article explores facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational capacity to address priority strategies for community-level chronic disease prevention. Interviews were conducted with a group of participants who previously participated in a community priority-setting workshop held in two Alberta communities. The goal of the workshop was to bring together key community stakeholders to collaboratively identify action strategies for preventing chronic diseases in their communities. While capacity building was not the specific aim of the workshop, it could be considered an unintended byproduct of bringing together community representatives around a specific issue. One purpose of this study was to examine the participants' capacity to take action on the priority strategies identified at the workshop. Eleven one-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with workshop participants to examine facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational level capacity building. Findings suggest that there were several barriers identified by participants that limited their capacity to take action on the workshop strategies, specifically: (i) organizations' lack of priorities or competing priorities; (ii) priorities secondary to the organizational mandate; (iii) disconnect between organizational and community priorities; (iv) disconnect between community organization priorities; (v) disconnect between organizations and government/funder priorities; (vi) limited resources (i.e. time, money and personnel); and, (vii) bigger community issues. The primary facilitator of individual capacity to take action or priority strategies was supportive organizations. Recognition of these elements will allow practitioners, organizations, governments/funders, and communities to focus on seeking ways to improve capacity for chronic disease prevention.

摘要

本文探讨了个人和组织在解决社区层面慢性病预防优先策略方面的能力的促进因素和障碍。采访了一组参与者,他们之前参加了在阿尔伯塔省两个社区举行的社区优先事项设定研讨会。研讨会的目的是召集主要社区利益相关者,共同确定预防社区慢性病的行动策略。虽然能力建设不是研讨会的具体目标,但它可以被视为将社区代表聚集在一个具体问题周围的意外副产品。本研究的目的之一是检查参与者在研讨会上确定的优先策略方面采取行动的能力。对研讨会参与者进行了 11 次一对一的半结构化访谈,以检查个人和组织层面能力建设的促进因素和障碍。研究结果表明,参与者确定了几个限制其采取行动的障碍,具体包括:(i) 组织缺乏优先事项或竞争优先事项;(ii) 优先事项次于组织任务;(iii) 组织和社区优先事项之间脱节;(iv) 社区组织之间的优先事项脱节;(v) 组织与政府/资助者之间的优先事项脱节;(vi) 资源有限(即时间、金钱和人员);以及 (vii) 更大的社区问题。采取行动或优先策略的个人能力的主要促进因素是支持性组织。认识到这些因素将使从业者、组织、政府/资助者和社区能够专注于寻找提高慢性病预防能力的方法。

相似文献

1
Exploring facilitators and barriers to individual and organizational level capacity building: outcomes of participation in a community priority setting workshop.探索个人和组织层面能力建设的促进因素和障碍:参与社区重点事项设定研讨会的成果。
Glob Health Promot. 2010 Jun;17(2):34-43. doi: 10.1177/1757975910365225.
2
Mechanisms for understanding the facilitators and barriers to capacity building for chronic disease prevention activities: an illustration.理解慢性病预防活动能力建设的促进因素和障碍的机制:一个实例
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Nov;12(6):858-66. doi: 10.1177/1524839910366424. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
3
Building health promotion capacity in a primary health care workforce in the Northern Territory: some lessons from practice.在北领地的基层医疗保健工作者中建立健康促进能力:实践中的一些经验教训。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):163-9. doi: 10.1071/HE13082.
4
Organizational capacity for community development in regional health authorities: a conceptual model.地区卫生当局社区发展的组织能力:一个概念模型
Health Promot Int. 2004 Sep;19(3):289-98. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah303.
5
Exploring the process of capacity-building among community-based health promotion workers in Alberta, Canada.探索加拿大艾伯塔省社区健康促进工作者的能力建设过程。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Sep;29(3):463-73. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat008. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
6
Organizational determinants of evaluation practice in Australian prevention agencies.澳大利亚预防机构评价实践的组织决定因素。
Health Educ Res. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):243-255. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy015.
7
Facilitators and challenges to organizational capacity building in heart health promotion.心脏健康促进中组织能力建设的促进因素与挑战
Qual Health Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):39-60. doi: 10.1177/1049732303259802.
8
Organizational contexts, implementation process, and capacity outcomes of multicultural, multilingual Home-Based Programs in public initiatives: A Mixed-Methods study.公共倡议中多元文化、多语言家庭计划的组织背景、实施过程和能力结果:一项混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3409-3426. doi: 10.1111/jan.15276. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
Building a Bridge Between Genetics and Outcomes Research: Application in Autism (The AutGO Study).建立遗传学与结局研究之间的桥梁:自闭症中的应用(AutGO 研究)。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):451-462. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0302-z.
10
Consumer-Involved Participatory Research to Address General Medical Health and Wellness in a Community Mental Health Setting.消费者参与式研究在社区心理健康环境中解决一般医疗健康和福祉问题。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1268-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500157. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Salient stakeholders: Using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders' influence in healthcare priority setting.重要利益相关者:运用显著利益相关者模型评估利益相关者在医疗保健优先级设定中的影响力。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jul 17;2:100048. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
People with lived experience (PWLE) of depression: describing and reflecting on an explicit patient engagement process within depression research priority setting in Alberta, Canada.有抑郁症亲身经历的人(PWLE):描述并反思加拿大艾伯塔省抑郁症研究优先事项设定中明确的患者参与过程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 16;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0115-1. eCollection 2018.
3
The top research questions asked by people with lived depression experience in Alberta: a survey.
艾伯塔省有抑郁症生活经历者提出的首要研究问题:一项调查。
CMAJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;6(3):E398-E405. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180034. Print 2018 Jul-Sep.
4
Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.患者和公众参与优先事项设定:文献系统快速综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193579. eCollection 2018.
5
Building capacity for dementia care in Latin America and the Caribbean.提升拉丁美洲和加勒比地区痴呆症护理能力。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2014 Dec 1;8(4):310-316. doi: 10.1590/s1980-57642014dn84000002.
6
Priority-setting for evidence-based health outreach in community-based organizations: A mixed-methods study in three Massachusetts communities.基于社区的组织中循证健康外展的优先事项设定:马萨诸塞州三个社区的混合方法研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):180-188. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0191-y.