Centre for Lymphoid Cancers.
Centre for Lymphoid Cancers.
Ann Oncol. 2011 May;22(5):1164-1169. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq574. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
The revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification maintains a histological grading system (grades 1-3) for follicular lymphoma (FL) and subdivides grade 3 into 3A (FL3A) and 3B (FL3B) subtypes. Optimal therapy of FL grade 3 and its potential curability with anthracycline-based chemotherapy remain uncertain.
We carried out a retrospective population-based analysis evaluating the clinical characteristics and outcome of FL3A and FL3B as strictly defined by WHO diagnostic criteria. Using the BC Cancer Agency Lymphoid Cancer Database, 161 patients with FL grade 3 were identified and, following detailed pathology review, composed of 139 with FL3A and 22 with FL3B.
Patients with FL3B had a higher overall International Prognostic Index (IPI) score than FL3A patients (P = 0.03), though no significant difference in individual IPI risk factor frequencies was noted. More patients with FL3B received front-line anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (82% versus 36%, P ≤ 0.001). With median follow-up of 45 months, no difference in disease-specific survival (P = 0.74) or overall survival (OS) (P = 0.87) was found between FL3A and FL3B and no survival curve plateau was observed. Analysis limited to FL3A patients showed no OS advantage with front-line anthracycline use (P = 0.33).
Using strict diagnostic criteria, there appears to be no difference in outcome between patients with FL3A and FL3B and no evidence of curability with anthracycline-based therapy.
修订后的世界卫生组织(WHO)分类法为滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)保留了组织学分级系统(1-3 级),并将 3 级细分为 3A(FL3A)和 3B(FL3B)亚型。FL 3 级的最佳治疗方法及其潜在的可治愈性,仍然不确定。
我们进行了一项回顾性基于人群的分析,评估了严格按照 WHO 诊断标准定义的 FL3A 和 FL3B 的临床特征和结局。使用不列颠哥伦比亚癌症署淋巴癌数据库,确定了 161 例 FL 3 级患者,经详细病理复查,其中 139 例为 FL3A,22 例为 FL3B。
FL3B 患者的总体国际预后指数(IPI)评分高于 FL3A 患者(P = 0.03),尽管单个 IPI 危险因素的频率无显著差异。更多的 FL3B 患者接受了一线含蒽环类药物的化疗(82%比 36%,P ≤ 0.001)。中位随访 45 个月,FL3A 和 FL3B 之间在疾病特异性生存(P = 0.74)或总生存(OS)(P = 0.87)方面无差异,也未观察到生存曲线的平台期。对 FL3A 患者的分析显示,一线使用蒽环类药物治疗并未带来 OS 优势(P = 0.33)。
使用严格的诊断标准,FL3A 和 FL3B 患者的结局似乎没有差异,也没有证据表明蒽环类药物治疗具有可治愈性。