• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A five years clinical evaluation of sealed occlusal surfaces of molars.

作者信息

Bendinskaite Ruta, Peciuliene Vytaute, Brukiene Vilma

机构信息

Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Stomatologija. 2010;12(3):87-92.

PMID:21063138
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Air-abrasion can be used for enamel preparation before fissure sealing as well as acid etching which is the evidence-based method for enamel preparation before sealing.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate the status of sealed occlusal surfaces of the first permanent molars after one, two, and five years and to compare consequence of using the two different methods for enamel preparation before sealing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At the baseline of the study 88 children of the age from 6 to 9 with caries-free permanent molars randomly received 185 sealants after using the air-abrasion system KCP 2000 PLUS (ADT Inc.) and 121 sealants using the acid etching method with Vococid (VoCo). Fissurit F (VoCo) was used for sealing. The status of occlusal surfaces of molars was scored as caries- free or decayed/restored by visual clinical assessment evaluation after one, two, and five years.

RESULTS

The sealants retention rate was 97.2%, 91.9%, 61.2% in the air-abrasion group and 96.3%, 92.6%, 62.4% in the acid etching group after one, two, and five years, respectively. The results showed 98.2%, 98.0%, 89.8% caries free occlusal surfaces of molars prepared with air-abrasion method and 100%, 100%, 94.6% caries free occlusal surfaces of molars prepared with acid etching method after one, two, and five years respectively.

CONCLUSION

The differences between the two methods: air-abrasion and acid etching in terms of sealant retention rate and caries development appeared to be statistically insignificant (p>0.05).

摘要

相似文献

1
A five years clinical evaluation of sealed occlusal surfaces of molars.
Stomatologija. 2010;12(3):87-92.
2
Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results.酸蚀与激光蚀刻对窝沟封闭剂临床性能影响的比较:24 个月的结果。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):151-8. doi: 10.2341/11-435-C. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
3
Microleakage of a resin sealant after acid-etching, Er:YAG laser irradiation and air-abrasion of pits and fissures.酸蚀、铒钇铝石榴石激光照射及窝沟空气喷砂处理后树脂封闭剂的微渗漏
J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001 Apr;19(2):83-7. doi: 10.1089/104454701750285403.
4
Comparison of air abrasion versus acid etch sealant techniques: six-month retention.空气喷砂与酸蚀封闭剂技术的比较:六个月的保留率
Pediatr Dent. 1997 May-Jun;19(4):258-61.
5
In-vitro microleakage of repaired fissure sealants: a randomized, controlled trial.修复性窝沟封闭剂的体外微渗漏:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jan;15(1):51-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00609.x.
6
Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleakage.浮石、裂隙釉质成形术和气涡轮机研磨对窝沟封闭剂微渗漏的评估。
Pediatr Dent. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):199-203.
7
Pit and Fissure Sealant Retention Following Air Abrasion Preparation with Bioactive Glass and Aluminum Oxide Particles.使用生物活性玻璃和氧化铝颗粒进行空气磨蚀预处理后窝沟封闭剂的保留情况。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2016 Sep 15;83(3):132-138.
8
A two-year clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air abrasion pretreatment in teenagers.对青少年使用和不使用空气磨蚀预处理放置窝沟封闭剂的两年临床评估。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Oct;137(10):1401-5. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0052.
9
Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An one-year comparative evaluation.窝沟封闭剂与流动复合树脂的保留情况:一年期对比评估。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_122_19.
10
Microleakage of a pit-and-fissure sealant: effect of air-abrasion compared with classical enamel preparations.窝沟封闭剂的微渗漏:与传统釉质预备相比,空气磨蚀的效果
J Adhes Dent. 2004 Spring;6(1):43-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Effectiveness of Air Abrasion When Compared to Conventional Acid-etching Technique in Enhancing the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review.与传统酸蚀技术相比,空气喷砂在提高窝沟封闭剂固位力方面的临床效果:一项系统评价
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Mar;17(3):377-384. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2782.
2
Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.玻璃离聚物水泥和树脂基密封剂保留的生存分析:一项 10 年随访研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 1;60(5):756. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050756.
3
Clinical success rate of fissure sealants: one-year follow-up.
窝沟封闭剂的临床成功率:一年随访
Eur Oral Res. 2020 Sep 1;54(3):109-113. doi: 10.26650/eor.20200572.
4
Sealants in dentistry: a systematic review of the literature.牙科中的窝沟封闭剂:文献系统综述
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014 Apr 4;6(3):67-74. eCollection 2013 Mar.