Mountford P J, Kettle A G, O'Doherty M J, Coakley A J
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, United Kingdom.
J Nucl Med. 1990 Mar;31(3):311-5.
Technetium-99m-HM-PAO [( 99mTc]HM-PAO) leukocyte and indium-111-oxine (111In-oxine) leukocyte scanning were carried out simultaneously in 41 patients at 4 hr and 24 hr after reinjection to determine whether the 4-hr 99mTc scan could replace the 24-hr 111In scan for detecting intraabdominal sepsis. Abdominal infection was confirmed in 12 cases. The 4-hr 99Tc-leukocyte scan, the 4-hr 111In-leukocyte scan, and the 24-hr 111In-leukocyte scan yielded a sensitivity of 100%, 67%, and 100%, respectively, and a specificity of 62%, 90%, and 86%, respectively. The 24-hr 99mTc-leukocyte scan also produced a sensitivity of 100%, but it was falsely positive in all 29 cases without infection due to physiologic bowel uptake. False-positive 4-hr 99mTc-leukocyte scans were also produced by physiologic bowel uptake in seven cases all of whom had true-negative 4-hr and 24-hr 111In-leukocyte scans. Because of the high incidence of false-positive 4-hr [99mTc]HM-PAO leukocyte scans, it was concluded that they could not replace 24-hr 111In-leukocyte scans for detecting intraabdominal sepsis, and that serial 99mTc leukocyte scans starting earlier than 4 hr after reinjection must be evaluated.
在41例患者再次注射后4小时和24小时同时进行了锝-99m-HM-PAO[(99mTc)HM-PAO]白细胞扫描和铟-111-氧嗪酸盐(111In-氧嗪酸盐)白细胞扫描,以确定4小时的99mTc扫描能否替代24小时的111In扫描来检测腹腔内脓毒症。12例患者确诊为腹部感染。4小时的99mTc白细胞扫描、4小时的111In白细胞扫描和24小时的111In白细胞扫描的敏感性分别为100%、67%和100%,特异性分别为62%、90%和86%。24小时 的99mTc白细胞扫描敏感性也为100%,但在所有29例无感染的病例中因生理性肠道摄取而出现假阳性。生理性肠道摄取在7例患者中也导致了4小时的99mTc白细胞扫描假阳性,所有这些患者的4小时和24小时的111In白细胞扫描均为真阴性。由于4小时的[99mTc]HM-PAO白细胞扫描假阳性发生率高,得出结论:它们不能替代24小时的111In白细胞扫描来检测腹腔内脓毒症,且必须对再次注射后早于4小时开始的系列99mTc白细胞扫描进行评估。