• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State level expert review committees--are they protected?州级专家评审委员会——它们受到保护吗?
Public Health Rep. 1990 Jan-Feb;105(1):13-23.
2
Medical malpractice litigation: the discoverability and use of hospitals' quality assurance committee records.
Med Malpract Cost Containment J. 1979 Jul;1(2):109-31.
3
Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
Hosp Med Staff. 1984 Jul;13(7):6-12.
4
Discoverability and admissibility of medical staff committee records: a state-by-state analysis.
Top Health Rec Manage. 1981 Sep;2(1):17-29.
5
The confidentiality of medical review committee proceedings under Georgia law.根据佐治亚州法律,医学审查委员会程序的保密性。
J Med Assoc Ga. 1980 Aug;69(8):711-3.
6
Protecting hospitals from judicial narrowing of state peer review statutes.
Healthspan. 1990 Oct;7(9):8-11.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
8
Hospital committee proceedings and reports: their legal status.医院委员会会议记录与报告:其法律地位
Am J Law Med. 1975 Fall;1(2):245-82.
9
Reallocating liability to medical staff review committee members: a response to the hospital corporate liability doctrine.将责任重新分配给医务人员评审委员会成员:对医院法人责任原则的回应。
Am J Law Med. 1984 Spring;10(1):115-38.
10
Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.医学同行评审:组织一种保护性方法的必要性。
Health Matrix Clevel. 1991 Spring;1(1):67-76.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer review: is testifying worth the hassle?同行评审:作证是否值得麻烦一番?
Med Econ. 1984 Aug 20;61(17):167-9, 172-3.
2
The peer review privilege: a law in search of a valid policy.同行评审特权:一项寻求有效政策的法律。
Am J Law Med. 1984 Summer;10(2):151-67.
3
History of the maternal mortality study committees in the United States.美国孕产妇死亡率研究委员会的历史。
Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Jul;34(1):123-38.
4
Hemorrhage, infection, toxemia, and cardiac disease, 1954-85: causes for their declining role in maternal mortality.1954年至1985年期间的出血、感染、毒血症和心脏病:其在孕产妇死亡率中作用下降的原因
Am J Public Health. 1988 Jun;78(6):671-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.6.671.
5
Maternal mortality surveillance.孕产妇死亡监测
Am J Public Health. 1988 Nov;78(11):1499-500. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.11.1499-a.
6
The need for national pregnancy mortality surveillance.国家孕产妇死亡监测的必要性。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1989 Jan-Feb;21(1):25-6.
7
The impact of state maternal mortality study committees on maternal deaths in the United States.美国各州孕产妇死亡率研究委员会对孕产妇死亡的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1977 Sep;67(9):830-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.9.830.

州级专家评审委员会——它们受到保护吗?

State level expert review committees--are they protected?

作者信息

Wright R F, Smith J C

机构信息

Wake Forest University School of Law.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1990 Jan-Feb;105(1):13-23.

PMID:2106700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1579974/
Abstract

Recently, the functioning of State-level expert review committees, operating under the auspices of professional medical societies, has become problematic. In particular, an increased number of State maternal mortality review committees have become inactive or disbanded primarily because of concern over liability of committee members and committee proceedings being used in litigation. A study was conducted of legal protection of the expert review process at the State level. The relevant immunity and privilege statutes of each State and the protection afforded by State law were analyzed. Findings show that, in all but a few States, the legal risk of participating in expert review is negligible. Most States have statutes that protect information involved in the review process from disclosure or use in subsequent litigation. Laws in most States also protect participants in the review process (both members of committees and providers of information) from civil liability.

摘要

最近,在专业医学协会主持下运作的国家级专家评审委员会的职能出现了问题。特别是,越来越多的州孕产妇死亡率评审委员会已停止运作或解散,主要原因是担心委员会成员的责任以及委员会程序被用于诉讼。对州一级专家评审过程的法律保护进行了一项研究。分析了每个州的相关豁免权和特权法规以及州法律提供的保护。研究结果表明,除少数几个州外,参与专家评审的法律风险可以忽略不计。大多数州都有法规保护评审过程中涉及的信息不被披露或用于后续诉讼。大多数州的法律还保护评审过程中的参与者(委员会成员和信息提供者)免于民事责任。