• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促黄体生成素给药对 GnRH 拮抗剂周期的影响:年龄调整分析。

Impact of luteinizing hormone administration on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: an age-adjusted analysis.

机构信息

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1031-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021
PMID:21067717
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the impact of LH administration on cycle outcome in ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonists.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, controlled trial performed in two age subgroups. Recombinant (r) FSH versus rFSH + rLH administration was compared.

SETTING

University-affiliated private infertility clinic.

PATIENT(S): Up to 35 years old (n = 380) and aged 36 to 39 years (n = 340), undergoing their first or second IVF cycle.

INTERVENTION(S): Recombinant LH administration since stimulation day 1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S): In the young population, implantation rates were similar: 27.8% versus 28.6%, odds ratio (OR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.47), as was the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle: 37.4% versus 37.4%, OR 1.0 (95% CI 0.66-1.52). In older patients, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the rFSH + rLH group: 26.7% versus 18.6%, OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.04-2.33). Ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle were 33.5% versus 25.3%, OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.93-2.38).

CONCLUSION(S): Recombinant LH administration significantly increased the implantation rate in patients aged 36 to 39 years. A clinically relevant better ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle was observed, although the difference was not statistically significant. Patients younger than 36 years do not obtain any benefit from rLH administration.

摘要

目的

分析黄体生成素(LH)给药对 GnRH 拮抗剂卵巢刺激周期结局的影响。

设计

在两个年龄亚组中进行的随机、开放标签、对照试验。比较重组(r)FSH 与 rFSH+rLH 给药。

地点

大学附属私立不孕诊所。

患者

年龄在 35 岁以下(n=380)和 36 岁至 39 岁(n=340),接受首次或第二次 IVF 周期。

干预

从刺激第 1 天开始给予重组 LH。

主要观察指标

种植率、持续妊娠率。

结果

在年轻人群中,种植率相似:27.8%对 28.6%,优势比(OR)为 1.03(95%置信区间[CI]为 0.73-1.47),每个开始周期的持续妊娠率也相似:37.4%对 37.4%,OR 为 1.0(95%CI 为 0.66-1.52)。在年龄较大的患者中,rFSH+rLH 组的种植率显著较高:26.7%对 18.6%,OR 为 1.56(95%CI 为 1.04-2.33)。每个开始周期的持续妊娠率为 33.5%对 25.3%,OR 为 1.49(95%CI 为 0.93-2.38)。

结论

rLH 给药可显著提高 36-39 岁患者的种植率。观察到每个开始周期的持续妊娠率有临床相关的改善,尽管差异无统计学意义。年龄小于 36 岁的患者不能从 rLH 给药中获益。

相似文献

1
Impact of luteinizing hormone administration on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: an age-adjusted analysis.促黄体生成素给药对 GnRH 拮抗剂周期的影响:年龄调整分析。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1031-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
2
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist plus recombinant luteinizing hormone vs. a standard GnRH agonist short protocol in patients at risk for poor ovarian response.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂联合重组促黄体生成素与标准GnRH激动剂短方案用于卵巢反应不良风险患者的比较
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jan;85(1):247-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1280.
3
A novel protocol of ovulation induction with delayed gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration combined with high-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and clomiphene citrate for poor responders and women over 35 years.一种新型的促排卵方案,即延迟给予促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂,联合大剂量重组促卵泡生成素和枸橼酸氯米芬,用于卵巢低反应者和35岁以上女性。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1572-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.022.
4
Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles.反应不良女性的卵巢反应及妊娠结局:一项关于补充黄体生成素对体外受精周期影响的随机对照试验
Fertil Steril. 2008 Mar;89(3):546-53. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.088. Epub 2007 May 29.
5
Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles.黄体期给予促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂对接受GnRH激动剂和拮抗剂治疗的卵巢刺激周期中卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)后胚胎着床的有益作用。
Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2572-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del173. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
6
Minimal stimulation using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone versus GnRH antagonist multiple-dose protocol in low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.使用 GnRH 拮抗剂和重组人卵泡刺激素进行最小刺激与 GnRH 拮抗剂多剂量方案在接受体外受精/胞浆内精子注射的低反应者中的比较。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Dec;92(6):2082-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
[Use of recombinant human luteinizing hormone for ovulation stimulation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].重组人促黄体生成素在体外受精-胚胎移植中用于促排卵的应用
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jun;45(6):420-3.
8
A randomized controlled trial of increasing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone after initiating a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.一项关于在启动促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂后增加重组促卵泡激素用于体外受精-胚胎移植的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.040. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
9
Supplementation with a recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin microdose leads to similar outcomes in ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone using either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist for pituitary suppression.补充重组人绒毛膜促性腺激素微剂量可导致使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂或拮抗剂抑制垂体的情况下,使用重组卵泡刺激素进行卵巢刺激产生相似的结果。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.075. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
10
Microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist flare-up protocol versus multiple dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycle.微剂量促性腺激素释放激素激动剂激发方案与多剂量促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案用于接受卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植周期的低反应者的比较
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.057. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjusting key performance indicators in ART laboratories according to controlled ovarian stimulation protocol.根据控制性卵巢刺激方案调整抗逆转录病毒治疗实验室的关键绩效指标。
Front Physiol. 2025 Aug 12;16:1632623. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1632623. eCollection 2025.
2
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.辅助生殖的控制性卵巢刺激方案:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2.
3
Three different protocols for pituitary suppression: progestins (dydrogesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate) versus GnRH antagonist-balancing efficacy and cost in ovarian stimulation.
三种不同的垂体抑制方案:孕激素(地屈孕酮或醋酸甲羟孕酮)与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂——在卵巢刺激中平衡疗效和成本
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03555-w.
4
Relationship Between Estradiol Levels Measured on the Initiation Day of GnRH Antagonist Treatment and Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients Receiving the Antagonist Protocol.GnRHa拮抗剂方案治疗患者中,GnRHa拮抗剂治疗起始日测得的雌二醇水平与妊娠结局的关系。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 17;61(4):741. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040741.
5
The influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the development of gonadotrophins and ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technologies.制药行业对辅助生殖技术中促性腺激素及卵巢刺激方案发展的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 4;16:1536844. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1536844. eCollection 2025.
6
Potential ability of circulating INSL3 level for the prediction of ovarian reserve and IVF success as a novel theca cell-specific biomarker in women with unexplained infertility and diminished ovarian reserve.循环中胰岛素样肽3(INSL3)水平作为一种新型的卵泡膜细胞特异性生物标志物,在预测不明原因不孕症和卵巢储备功能减退女性的卵巢储备及体外受精成功率方面的潜在能力。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 13;23(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01367-2.
7
The role of recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation: what's new?重组促黄体生成素在卵巢刺激中的作用:有哪些新进展?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 10;23(Suppl 1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01361-8.
8
Highly purified-hMG versus rFSH in ovarian hyperstimulation in women undergoing elective fertility preservation: a retrospective cohort study.在接受选择性生育力保存的女性中,高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素与重组促卵泡生成素用于卵巢过度刺激的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):136-144. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240099.
9
FSH/LH co-stimulation in Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) and hypo-responder patients - Arabian gulf delphi consensus group.高龄产妇(AMA)和低反应患者中的促卵泡生成素/促黄体生成素联合刺激——阿拉伯湾德尔菲共识小组
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 12;15:1506332. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1506332. eCollection 2024.
10
Luteinizing hormone profiles during ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive treatment.辅助生殖治疗中卵巢刺激期间的促黄体生成素谱。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 4;15:1481546. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1481546. eCollection 2024.