Degenhardt Brian F, Johnson Jane C, Snider Karen T, Snider Eric J
A.T. Still Research Institute, A.T. Still University, 800 W Jefferson St, Kirksville, MO 63501-1443, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Oct;110(10):579-86.
Few studies have shown that diagnostic palpation is reliable. No studies have shown that the reliability of diagnostic palpatory skills can be maintained and improved over time.
To investigate whether the reliability of selected palpatory tests used to identify lumbar somatic dysfunction was maintained during a 4-month period as part of a clinical observational study.
Participants with low back pain and participants without low back pain, recruited from a rural Midwestern community, were examined during 6 separate sessions over a 4-month period. During each data collection session, two blinded examiners, who had previously completed comprehensive consensus training, evaluated the lumbar region with four tests: static segmental positional asymmetry of the transverse processes in the horizontal plane, tissue texture abnormalities, resistance to anterior springing on the spinous processes, and tenderness induced by pressure on the spinous processes. Detailed protocols for each test were defined during a previous comprehensive consensus training period and were not revised during the current study. To verify that established interobserver reliability was maintained throughout the clinical study, quality control sampling was performed on all data. When findings were inconsistent between the two examiners, focused consensus training was performed as a means of recalibration to understand why assessments were inconsistent. Interobserver reliability for determining the presence or absence of somatic dysfunction was assessed using kappa coefficients.
The study enrolled 64 participants, and 14 to 33 participants were examined per session. All four tests had acceptable interobserver reliability by the final data collection session. The test for static segmental positional asymmetry of the transverse processes in the horizontal plane had moderate to substantial reliability in all 6 sessions. The test for tissue texture abnormalities had moderate reliability in 5 of the 6 sessions. The test for resistance to anterior springing on the spinous processes had moderate reliability for 3 of the 6 sessions. The test for tenderness had substantial to almost perfect reliability for all 6 sessions. In general, interobserver reliability improved over time.
Examiners were able to maintain and improve interobserver reliability of four lumbar diagnostic palpatory tests over a 4-month period.
很少有研究表明诊断性触诊是可靠的。没有研究表明诊断性触诊技能的可靠性能够随着时间的推移而得以维持和提高。
作为一项临床观察性研究的一部分,调查在4个月的时间里,用于识别腰椎躯体功能障碍的特定触诊检查的可靠性是否得以维持。
从美国中西部农村社区招募的腰痛患者和无腰痛患者,在4个月的时间里分6次进行检查。在每次数据收集环节,两名经过全面一致性培训且不知情的检查者,通过四项检查对腰椎区域进行评估:横突在水平面的静态节段位置不对称、组织质地异常、棘突向前弹跳的阻力以及棘突受压引起的压痛。每项检查的详细方案在之前的全面一致性培训期间确定,在本研究中未作修订。为了验证在整个临床研究过程中观察者间既定的可靠性得以维持,对所有数据进行了质量控制抽样。当两名检查者的检查结果不一致时,进行针对性的一致性培训,作为重新校准的一种手段,以了解评估不一致的原因。使用kappa系数评估确定躯体功能障碍是否存在的观察者间可靠性。
该研究招募了64名参与者,每次检查14至33名参与者。到最后一次数据收集环节时,所有四项检查均具有可接受的观察者间可靠性。横突在水平面的静态节段位置不对称检查在所有6次检查中具有中度至高度可靠性。组织质地异常检查在6次检查中的5次具有中度可靠性。棘突向前弹跳阻力检查在6次检查中的3次具有中度可靠性。压痛检查在所有6次检查中具有高度至几乎完美的可靠性。总体而言,观察者间可靠性随时间提高。
在4个月的时间里,检查者能够维持并提高四项腰椎诊断性触诊检查的观察者间可靠性。