Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Estaing Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1310-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc640a.
Pulmonary function is impaired during pneumoperitoneum mainly as a result of atelectasis formation. We studied the effects of 10 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and PEEP followed by a recruitment maneuver (PEEP+RM) on end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Sixty consecutive adult patients (30 obese, 30 healthy weight) in reverse Trendelenburg position were prospectively studied. EELV, static elastance of the respiratory system, dead space, and gas exchange were measured before and after pneumoperitoneum insufflation with zero end-expiratory pressure, with PEEP alone, and with PEEP+RM. Results are presented as mean ± SD.
Pneumoperitoneum reduced EELV (healthy weight, 1195 ± 405 vs. 1724 ± 774 ml; obese, 751 ± 258 vs. 886 ± 284 ml) and worsened static elastance and dead space in both groups (in all P < 0.01 vs. zero-end expiratory pressure before pneumoperitoneum) whereas oxygenation was unaffected. PEEP increased EELV (healthy weight, 570 ml, P < 0.01; obese, 364 ml, P < 0.01) with no effect on oxygenation. Compared with PEEP alone, EELV and static elastance were further improved after RM in both groups (P < 0.05), as was oxygenation (P < 0.01). In all patients, RM-induced change in EELV was 16% (P = 0.04). These improvements were maintained 30 min after RM. RM-induced changes in EELV correlated with change in oxygenation (r = 0.42, P < 0.01).
RM combined with 10 cm H2O of PEEP improved EELV, respiratory mechanics, and oxygenation during pneumoperitoneum whereas PEEP alone did not.
气腹会导致肺功能受损,主要是由于肺不张的形成。我们研究了 10cmH2O 呼气末正压(PEEP)和 PEEP 后进行肺复张(PEEP+RM)对接受腹腔镜手术患者的呼气末肺容积(EELV)、氧合和呼吸力学的影响。
60 例连续的成年患者(肥胖 30 例,健康体重 30 例)取反 Trendenlenburg 位,前瞻性研究。在零呼气末正压、单独使用 PEEP 和 PEEP+RM 时,测量气腹前和气腹后 EELV、呼吸力学系统静态顺应性、死腔和气体交换。结果以均值 ± SD 表示。
气腹降低了 EELV(健康体重组,1195±405 比 1724±774ml;肥胖组,751±258 比 886±284ml),并恶化了两组的静态顺应性和死腔(所有 P<0.01 比气腹前零呼气末正压),但氧合没有受到影响。PEEP 增加了 EELV(健康体重组,570ml,P<0.01;肥胖组,364ml,P<0.01),但对氧合没有影响。与单独使用 PEEP 相比,RM 后两组的 EELV 和静态顺应性进一步改善(P<0.05),氧合也得到改善(P<0.01)。所有患者 RM 诱导的 EELV 变化为 16%(P=0.04)。这些改善在 RM 后 30 分钟仍能维持。RM 诱导的 EELV 变化与氧合变化相关(r=0.42,P<0.01)。
与单独使用 PEEP 相比,RM 联合 10cmH2O 的 PEEP 改善了气腹期间的 EELV、呼吸力学和氧合,而单独使用 PEEP 则没有。