• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄

Carotid stenting for restenosis after endarterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Jun;34(3):488-92. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0006-9. Epub 2010 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-010-0006-9
PMID:21069326
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been described in 8-19% of patients, 14-23% of whom become symptomatic. This study analyzes our experience with carotid artery stenting (CAS) for post-CEA recurrent stenoses.

METHOD

Retrospective database and case-note review.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and September 2008, a total of 27 patients (15 symptomatic) with hemodynamically significant internal carotid artery post-CEA restenosis underwent CAS. Median stenosis of target vessels was 90% (range 75-95%). There was one periprocedural death (3.7%); no others occurred during the median 34-month follow-up (range 0.1-84 months). There was one late transient ischemic attack 12 months after CAS that was not associated with in-stent restenosis. One 90% restenosis and one occlusion were detected during follow-up at 38 and 57 months after CAS. The remaining patients had no evidence of further restenosis and remained free from cerebrovascular symptoms.

CONCLUSION

CAS offers a feasible option for the management of carefully selected patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic restenosis after CEA.

摘要

简介

颈动脉内膜切除术 (CEA) 后的再狭窄在 8-19%的患者中被描述,其中 14-23%的患者出现症状。本研究分析了我们在颈动脉支架置入术 (CAS) 治疗 CEA 后复发性狭窄方面的经验。

方法

回顾性数据库和病例记录回顾。

结果

在 2000 年 1 月至 2008 年 9 月期间,共有 27 例(15 例有症状)患有血流动力学显著的颈内动脉 CEA 后再狭窄患者接受了 CAS 治疗。靶血管的狭窄中位数为 90%(范围 75-95%)。有 1 例围手术期死亡(3.7%);在中位数为 34 个月的随访期间(范围 0.1-84 个月)没有发生其他死亡。有 1 例迟发性短暂性脑缺血发作发生在 CAS 后 12 个月,与支架内再狭窄无关。在 CAS 后 38 个月和 57 个月时,检测到 1 例 90%的再狭窄和 1 例闭塞。其余患者没有进一步再狭窄的证据,也没有脑血管症状。

结论

CAS 为有症状和无症状 CEA 后再狭窄的精心选择的患者提供了一种可行的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Carotid stenting for restenosis after endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Jun;34(3):488-92. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0006-9. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
2
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
3
Redo surgery or carotid stenting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: results of two different treatment strategies.颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄的再次手术或颈动脉支架置入术:两种不同治疗策略的结果
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;24(2):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
4
Prosthetic bypass for restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting of the carotid artery.颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后再狭窄的人工血管搭桥术。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1664-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.046. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty-stenting: incidence and management.颈动脉血管成形术-支架置入术后支架内再狭窄:发生率及处理
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Feb;33(2):220-5; discussion 225-6. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111880.
6
Outcome of carotid artery stenting in the hands of vascular surgeons.血管外科医生进行颈动脉支架置入术的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Aug;402(5):805-810. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1585-6. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
8
Carotid artery stenting outcomes are equivalent to carotid endarterectomy outcomes for patients with post-carotid endarterectomy stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术的结果与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄患者的结果相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.074. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
9
Ultrasound surveillance after CAS and CEA: what's the evidence?颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术术后的超声监测:证据有哪些?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):33-41.
10
Carotid angioplasty and stenting for postendarterectomy stenosis: long-term follow-up.颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的血管成形术和支架置入术:长期随访
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting Following Previous Carotid Endarterectomy vs De Novo Lesions.既往颈动脉内膜切除术与新发病变后颈动脉支架置入术的长期比较结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1526602815581597. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
2
Increased atherogenesis during Streptococcus mutans infection in ApoE-null mice.变形链球菌感染载脂蛋白 E 基因敲除小鼠促进动脉粥样硬化形成。
J Dent Res. 2012 Mar;91(3):255-60. doi: 10.1177/0022034511435101. Epub 2012 Jan 18.