Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Feb;34(1):37-49. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0012-y. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
Conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads are increasingly being performed interchangeably in many institutions throughout the world. As both therapies continue to being tested in many phase II and III studies and in combination with other therapies, especially targeted agents, for treatment of primary and metastatic liver cancer, it is imperative to review their current status and evaluate their impact on patient survival. This review critically assesses patient selection, indications, contraindications, techniques, materials, safety, and clinical outcomes of patients treated with conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads.
在世界范围内,越来越多的医疗机构开始常规地采用经导管动脉化疗栓塞术和载药微球化疗栓塞术进行治疗,且两者可相互替代。随着这两种疗法在许多二期和三期研究中不断得到测试,并与其他疗法(特别是靶向药物)联合应用于原发性和转移性肝癌的治疗,对其当前状况进行评估并研究其对患者生存率的影响至关重要。本综述对采用常规化疗栓塞术和载药微球化疗栓塞术治疗的患者的患者选择、适应证、禁忌证、技术、材料、安全性和临床结果进行了批判性评估。