Suppr超能文献

处理输尿管远端的手术技术是否会影响肾输尿管切除术的结果?

Does the surgical technique for management of the distal ureter influence the outcome after nephroureterectomy?

机构信息

Academic Department of Urology of la Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris VI, Paris, France.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2011 Jul;108(1):130-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09835.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

Abstract

Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The resection of the distal ureter and its orifice is an oncological principle during radical nephroureterectomy which is based on the fact that it represents a part of the urinary tract exposed to a considerable risk of recurrence. After removal of the proximal part it is hardly possible to image or approach it by endoscopy during follow-up. Recent publications on survival after nephroureterectomy do not allow the conclusion that removal of distal ureter and bladder cuff are useless. Several techniques of distal ureter removal have been described but they are not equivalent in term of oncological safety. • The standard treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs) must obey oncological principles, which consist of a complete en bloc resection of the kidney and the ureter, as well as excision of a bladder cuff to avoid tumour seeding. • The open technique is the 'gold standard' of treatment to which all other techniques developed are necessarily compared, and various surgical procedures have been described. • The laparoscopic stapling technique maintains a closed system but risks leaving behind the ureteric and bladder cuff segments. • Transvesical laparoscopic detachment and ligation is a valid approach from an oncological stance but is technically difficult. The major inconvenience of the transurethral resection of the ureteric orifice and intussusception techniques is the potential for tumour seeding. • Management of the distal ureter via the robot-assisted laparoscopic method is technically feasible, but outcomes from these procedures are still preliminary. • Therefore, prospective comparative studies with more thorough explorations of these techniques are needed to solve the dilemma of the management of the distal ureter during nephroureterectomy. However, bladder cuff excision should remain the standard of care irrespective of the stage of the disease.

摘要

研究类型 - 治疗(病例系列) 证据级别 4 已知的是什么?研究增加了什么? 在根治性肾输尿管切除术期间,切除远端输尿管及其口是一种肿瘤学原则,这基于以下事实,即它代表了暴露于相当高复发风险的尿路部分。近端切除后,在随访期间通过内窥镜几乎不可能对其进行成像或接近。最近关于肾输尿管切除术后生存的出版物并不能得出切除远端输尿管和膀胱袖口无用的结论。已经描述了几种远端输尿管切除技术,但它们在肿瘤安全性方面并不等同。 • 上尿路尿路上皮癌(UUT-UC)的标准治疗必须遵守肿瘤学原则,包括完整的肾脏和输尿管整块切除,以及切除膀胱袖口以避免肿瘤播种。 • 开放技术是治疗的“金标准”,所有其他开发的技术都必须与之进行比较,并已描述了各种手术程序。 • 腹腔镜吻合技术保持封闭系统,但存在遗留输尿管和膀胱袖口段的风险。 • 经膀胱腹腔镜分离和结扎从肿瘤学角度来看是一种有效的方法,但技术上很困难。经尿道输尿管口和套叠技术切除的主要不便之处在于存在肿瘤播种的潜在风险。 • 通过机器人辅助腹腔镜方法管理远端输尿管在技术上是可行的,但这些程序的结果仍然是初步的。 • 因此,需要进行前瞻性比较研究,更彻底地探索这些技术,以解决肾输尿管切除术中远端输尿管处理的困境。然而,无论疾病的阶段如何,膀胱袖口切除仍然应该是护理标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验