• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

未接种疫苗、已断奶小牛经系统口蹄疫(FMD)疫苗接种区运输的风险评估。

Risk evaluation of nonvaccinated, weaned calves transported through areas under systematic foot and mouth disease (FMD) vaccination.

机构信息

Alberto Soriano Graduate School, Faculty of Agronomy, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 2011 Feb 1;98(2-3):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.10.006
PMID:21071104
Abstract

The recurrence and persistence of foot and mouth disease (FMD) could be the consequence of cyclic and massive transportation of calves. For this reason, in South America, vaccination strategies related to livestock dynamic are being promoted. In order to aid the evaluation of such strategies, a method for predicting the risk of transportation of nonvaccinated weaned calves was developed; this method combines expert opinion and empirical evidence using Bayesian estimators. It was applied through Monte Carlo simulation to data of Argentina under four hypothetical vaccination schemes: E1, extended vaccination season of 1/6 of the population of calves each month from July to December without second round vaccination (SRV); E2, extended irregular vaccination from July to December with SRV applied to 70% of the calves resembling the scheme applied in Argentina in 2001; E3, vaccination in November and December without SRV; and E4, vaccination concentrated in November. E1 resulted in probability of transporting non vaccinated calves (tnvc) reaching its maximum in the following year in May with mean=0.0250 and percentile 95% (P95)=0.0404; for the same month tnvc estimates for the other schemes were E2: mean=0.0071; P95=0.0162; E3: mean=0.0017; P95=0.0042 and E4: mean=0.0001; P95=0.0004. Bonferroni multiple comparison for simultaneous assertions for May showed that E4 resulted the best scheme, E1 the worst, and E2 and E3 are intermediate with nonsignificant difference observed between overall (p<0.05). Results were consistent with historical records and quantification for future needs for re-vaccination was made possible. While the ratio "total vaccinated"/"total estimated existences" will give a biased vision of vaccination coverage under the situation of extended vaccination campaigns, a model as the one developed here could allow a more accurate assessment and the design of mitigation plans.

摘要

口蹄疫(FMD)的复发和持续存在可能是由于小牛的周期性和大规模运输造成的。出于这个原因,在南美洲,正在推广与牲畜动态相关的疫苗接种策略。为了帮助评估这些策略,开发了一种预测未接种断奶小牛运输风险的方法;该方法结合了贝叶斯估计器的专家意见和经验证据。它通过蒙特卡罗模拟应用于阿根廷的数据,根据四种假设的疫苗接种方案:E1,从 7 月到 12 月,每月对 1/6 的小牛人口进行延长疫苗接种季节,没有第二轮疫苗接种(SRV);E2,从 7 月到 12 月进行不规律的延长疫苗接种,对 70%的小牛进行 SRV,类似于 2001 年在阿根廷实施的计划;E3,11 月和 12 月不接种疫苗;E4,集中在 11 月接种疫苗。E1 导致未接种疫苗的小牛(tnvc)在次年 5 月达到最大值,平均值为 0.0250,95%百分位数(P95)为 0.0404;对于同月的其他方案,tnvc 估计值为 E2:平均值=0.0071;P95=0.0162;E3:平均值=0.0017;P95=0.0042 和 E4:平均值=0.0001;P95=0.0004。5 月同时断言的 Bonferroni 多重比较表明,E4 是最好的方案,E1 是最差的方案,E2 和 E3 是中间方案,总体上没有观察到差异(p<0.05)。结果与历史记录一致,并为未来重新接种疫苗的需求进行了量化。虽然在延长疫苗接种活动的情况下,“总接种人数”与“总估计存在人数”的比例将对口蹄疫疫苗接种覆盖率产生偏差,但像这里开发的模型可以进行更准确的评估和制定缓解计划。

相似文献

1
Risk evaluation of nonvaccinated, weaned calves transported through areas under systematic foot and mouth disease (FMD) vaccination.未接种疫苗、已断奶小牛经系统口蹄疫(FMD)疫苗接种区运输的风险评估。
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Feb 1;98(2-3):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
2
Vaccination against foot and mouth disease reduces virus transmission in groups of calves.接种口蹄疫疫苗可减少犊牛群体中的病毒传播。
Vaccine. 2005 Sep 30;23(41):4887-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.05.014.
3
Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease II: Regaining FMD-free status.口蹄疫疫苗接种 II:恢复无口蹄疫状态。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Nov 1;107(1-2):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
4
Different infection parameters between dairy cows and calves after an infection with foot-and-mouth disease virus.感染口蹄疫病毒后奶牛和犊牛的不同感染参数。
Vet J. 2010 Oct;186(1):116-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.06.031. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
5
Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease.针对口蹄疫的疫苗接种策略建模。
Nature. 2003 Jan 9;421(6919):136-42. doi: 10.1038/nature01343. Epub 2002 Dec 22.
6
Vaccines and foot-and-mouth disease eradication in South America.南美洲的疫苗与口蹄疫根除
Dev Biol (Basel). 2003;114:67-77.
7
Factors associated with within-herd transmission of serotype A foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle, during the 2001 outbreak in Argentina: a protective effect of vaccination.2001 年阿根廷 A 型口蹄疫疫情期间牛群内传播的相关因素:疫苗接种的保护作用。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011 Oct;58(5):387-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01217.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
8
The NSP immune response of vaccinated animals after in-field exposure to FMDV.在田间暴露于口蹄疫病毒后,接种疫苗动物的NSP免疫反应。
Vaccine. 2007 Nov 28;25(49):8298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.071. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
9
Risk factors for infection with Foot-and-Mouth Disease virus in a cattle population vaccinated with a non-purified vaccine in Iran.在伊朗使用非纯化疫苗接种的牛群中感染口蹄疫病毒的风险因素
Prev Vet Med. 2015 May 1;119(3-4):114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
10
Updating of the correlation between lpELISA titers and protection from virus challenge for the assessment of the potency of polyvalent aphtovirus vaccines in Argentina.更新用于评估阿根廷多价口蹄疫病毒疫苗效力的液相阻断ELISA滴度与病毒攻击保护之间的相关性。
Vaccine. 2008 Dec 2;26(51):6577-86. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.033.