Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Circ J. 2011;75(1):73-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0434. Epub 2010 Nov 7.
The incidence and clinical implication of dissociated pulmonary vein (PV) electrical activities after circumferential antrum PV ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear.
A total of 196 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF who underwent circumferential antrum PV ablation were prospectively studied. Dissociated PV electrical activities were observed in 101 patients (Group 1), but absent in the remaining 95 patients (Group 2). There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristics between them, except that Group 2 had a higher prevalence of hypertension (30 vs. 44%, P = 0.04). After 21.8 ± 7.9 months of follow-up, 148 had no recurrence of AF after the initial procedure. AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.023). Relapse of PV conduction was the major cause of AF recurrence in both groups (16/16 vs. 19/23, P = 0.08), and the overall procedural success rate after the redo ablation procedure was similar in the 2 groups (90 vs. 86%, P = 0.44). However, the total number of patients with non-PV foci was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (12/95 vs. 2/101, P < 0.01).
Dissociated PV electrical activities might identify a subgroup of patients with relatively higher initial procedural success with circumferential PV antrum ablation.
环肺静脉消融治疗阵发性心房颤动(房颤)后分离肺静脉(PV)电活动的发生率及其临床意义尚不清楚。
前瞻性研究了 196 例症状性阵发性房颤患者,这些患者均接受了环肺静脉消融术。101 例患者(1 组)观察到分离的 PV 电活动,但其余 95 例患者(2 组)则没有(P<0.01)。两组患者的基线临床特征无显著差异,但 2 组高血压的患病率更高(30%比 44%,P=0.04)。在 21.8±7.9 个月的随访后,148 例患者在初始手术后无房颤复发。2 组的房颤复发率有显著差异(P=0.023)。两组中,PV 传导的复发是房颤复发的主要原因(16/16 比 19/23,P=0.08),两组再次消融手术后的总手术成功率相似(90%比 86%,P=0.44)。然而,2 组中非 PV 灶的患者总数明显多于 1 组(12/95 比 2/101,P<0.01)。
分离的 PV 电活动可能是环肺静脉消融治疗阵发性房颤后初始手术成功率较高的亚组患者的特征。