Department of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(2):155-63. doi: 10.1159/000321347. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
To evaluate two different multiplex real-time PCR assays detecting fetal RHD for screening of RhD negative women in relation to antenatal RhD prophylaxis.
We designed a duplex assay for the detection of RHD exon 7 and 10 and a triplex assay for the detection of RHD exon 7, 10 and 5. We used the same fluorescent dye for the exon 7 and 10 probes to increase sensitivity; exon 5 was VIC labeled. We evaluated possible inhibition of DNA amplification with dilution experiments. We then tested the two multiplex assays with DNA extracted from 97 plasma samples from 38 RhD negative women in gestational weeks 6-37.
Dilution experiments revealed no inhibition of amplification in the multiplex assays. For plasma samples, the duplex assay was significantly more sensitive than the triplex assay (p < 0.0001). For the duplex assay (exon 7/10), accuracy was 99.0%. For the triplex assay (exon 7/10), accuracy was 94.2%. Detection of exon 5 was less reliable.
The duplex assay using exon 7/10 was the most reliable for prenatal prediction of fetal RhD type as a candidate assay for screening of RhD negative women in relation to antenatal RhD prophylaxis. The triplex assay needs further optimization.
评估两种不同的多重实时 PCR 检测方法,用于检测 RhD 阴性孕妇的胎儿 RHD,以进行产前 RhD 预防。
我们设计了一种用于检测 RHD 外显子 7 和 10 的双重检测方法,以及一种用于检测 RHD 外显子 7、10 和 5 的三重检测方法。我们使用相同的荧光染料标记外显子 7 和 10 的探针以提高灵敏度;外显子 5 用 VIC 标记。我们通过稀释实验评估了 DNA 扩增的可能抑制情况。然后,我们使用从 38 名妊娠 6-37 周的 RhD 阴性女性的 97 份血浆样本中提取的 DNA 测试了这两种多重检测方法。
稀释实验显示多重检测中没有扩增抑制。对于血浆样本,双重检测比三重检测更灵敏(p<0.0001)。对于双重检测(外显子 7/10),准确性为 99.0%。对于三重检测(外显子 7/10),准确性为 94.2%。外显子 5 的检测不太可靠。
用于产前预测胎儿 RhD 型的双重检测(使用外显子 7/10)是最可靠的,可作为产前 RhD 预防中针对 RhD 阴性女性的筛选候选检测方法。三重检测需要进一步优化。