Suppr超能文献

新麻风病患者接触者单次利福平化学预防干预的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of a chemoprophylactic intervention with single dose rifampicin in contacts of new leprosy patients.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Nov 2;4(11):e874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000874.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With 249,007 new leprosy patients detected globally in 2008, it remains necessary to develop new and effective interventions to interrupt the transmission of M. leprae. We assessed the economic benefits of single dose rifampicin (SDR) for contacts as chemoprophylactic intervention in the control of leprosy.

METHODS

We conducted a single centre, double blind, cluster randomised, placebo controlled trial in northwest Bangladesh between 2002 and 2007, including 21,711 close contacts of 1,037 patients with newly diagnosed leprosy. We gave a single dose of rifampicin or placebo to close contacts, with follow-up for four years. The main outcome measure was the development of clinical leprosy. We assessed the cost effectiveness by calculating the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the standard multidrug therapy (MDT) program with the additional chemoprophylaxis intervention versus the standard MDT program only. The ICER was expressed in US dollars per prevented leprosy case.

FINDINGS

Chemoprophylaxis with SDR for preventing leprosy among contacts of leprosy patients is cost-effective at all contact levels and thereby a cost-effective prevention strategy. In total, $6,009 incremental cost was invested and 38 incremental leprosy cases were prevented, resulting in an ICER of $158 per one additional prevented leprosy case. It was the most cost-effective in neighbours of neighbours and social contacts (ICER $214), slightly less cost-effective in next door neighbours (ICER $497) and least cost-effective among household contacts (ICER $856).

CONCLUSION

Chemoprophylaxis with single dose rifampicin given to contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients is a cost-effective intervention strategy. Implementation studies are necessary to establish whether this intervention is acceptable and feasible in other leprosy endemic areas of the world.

摘要

背景

2008 年全球共发现 249007 例新麻风病患者,因此仍需开发新的有效干预措施来阻断麻风分枝杆菌的传播。我们评估了单剂量利福平(SDR)作为接触者化学预防干预措施在麻风病控制中的经济效益。

方法

我们于 2002 年至 2007 年在孟加拉国西北部进行了一项单中心、双盲、整群随机、安慰剂对照试验,纳入了 1037 例新诊断麻风病患者的 21711 名密切接触者。我们给密切接触者服用单剂量利福平或安慰剂,并进行了四年的随访。主要结局指标是临床麻风病的发生。我们通过计算标准多药疗法(MDT)方案加化学预防干预与仅标准 MDT 方案之间的增量成本效益比(ICER)来评估成本效益。ICER 以每预防一例麻风病的美元数表示。

结果

在所有接触者水平,用 SDR 对麻风病患者的接触者进行化学预防来预防麻风病是具有成本效益的,因此是一种具有成本效益的预防策略。总共投入了 6009 美元的增量成本,预防了 38 例额外的麻风病病例,导致每额外预防一例麻风病的 ICER 为 158 美元。在邻居的邻居和社会接触者(ICER 为 214 美元)中最具成本效益,在隔壁邻居(ICER 为 497 美元)中略低,在家庭接触者(ICER 为 856 美元)中最低。

结论

给新诊断的麻风病患者的接触者服用单剂量利福平进行化学预防是一种具有成本效益的干预策略。需要进行实施研究,以确定这种干预措施在世界其他麻风病流行地区是否可以接受和可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f138/2970532/ed6b5baba7b2/pntd.0000874.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验