Moffitt Cancer Center, Donald A. Adam Comprehensive Melanoma Research Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Semin Oncol. 2010 Oct;37(5):430-9. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.09.005.
Much of the recent excitement in the translational field of tumor immunology and immunotherapy has been generated by the recognition that immune checkpoint proteins can be blocked by human antibodies with profound effects in vitro, in animal tumor systems, and in patients. Promising clinical data have already been generated in melanoma and other tumor types with human antibodies directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1). The preclinical data that supported the clinical development of these two antibodies will be discussed in detail in this review, showing that many of the therapeutic effects of these two agents were predicted by the animal models, as were the immune-related side effects noted with these drugs. In contrast, much of the early work with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies indicated that it had a potent therapeutic effect only when combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-transduced tumor vaccines, and that the antibody alone was effective only in the most immunogenic tumor models in mice. Intriguingly, in patients, the drug alone clearly has had important therapeutic effects, but the addition of vaccines has not added to its clinical benefit. Murine experiments also suggested that CTLA-4 abrogation might function via important effects on natural T-regulatory cells that were CD4(+), CD25(+high), and FOXp3(+), but this has not been borne out in experiments using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and unlike in animals, in humans the exact mechanism(s) by which CTLA-4 abrogation induced an anti-tumor effect is still unclear. Abrogation of PD-1 functions via different immune signaling pathways than CTLA-4 and is likely to have a different spectrum of effects than blocking CTLA-4. For PD-1 blockade, murine experiments have suggested that the antibody alone and combined with adoptive cell transfer or vaccine approaches would be therapeutically beneficial, and that clear effects on T-cell proliferation and activation, as well as T-regulatory cell function would be observed in patients. The clinical development of anti-PD-1 antibody so far has shown that it has a potent effect when administered alone, and trials of vaccines with anti-PD-1 are just being initiated to test the idea that the predicted effects of that antibody observed in animal systems also would be seen in patients. These observations support the idea that animal preclinical therapeutic experiments are an important guide to the conduct of trials employing abrogation of immune checkpoint proteins in T cells in patients. Nonetheless, clinical investigators must be flexible and prepared to find that the biology of those systems may be very different in humans compared to mice.
近年来,肿瘤免疫学和免疫治疗领域的转化研究令人兴奋,其原因是人们认识到免疫检查点蛋白可以被人类抗体阻断,从而在体外、动物肿瘤系统和患者中产生深远的影响。针对细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞抗原-4(CTLA-4)和程序性死亡-1(PD-1)的人类抗体在黑色素瘤和其他肿瘤类型中已经产生了有前途的临床数据。本文将详细讨论支持这两种抗体临床开发的临床前数据,表明这些药物的许多治疗效果都是通过动物模型预测的,就像这些药物的免疫相关副作用一样。相比之下,早期使用抗 CTLA-4 抗体的大部分工作表明,只有与粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)转导的肿瘤疫苗联合使用时,它才具有很强的治疗效果,而单独使用抗体仅在最具免疫原性的小鼠肿瘤模型中有效。有趣的是,在患者中,单独使用该药物显然具有重要的治疗效果,但添加疫苗并没有增加其临床益处。鼠实验还表明,CTLA-4 阻断可能通过对 CD4(+)、CD25(+)高和 FOXp3(+)的天然 T 调节细胞的重要影响起作用,但在使用接受抗 CTLA-4 抗体治疗的患者外周血单核细胞的实验中并未得到证实,与动物不同,在人类中,CTLA-4 阻断诱导抗肿瘤作用的确切机制尚不清楚。PD-1 功能的阻断通过与 CTLA-4 不同的免疫信号通路,并且可能具有比阻断 CTLA-4 不同的作用谱。对于 PD-1 阻断,鼠实验表明,单独使用抗体以及与过继细胞转移或疫苗方法联合使用将具有治疗益处,并且在患者中观察到对 T 细胞增殖和激活以及 T 调节细胞功能的明显影响。迄今为止,抗 PD-1 抗体的临床开发表明,单独使用时具有很强的效果,并且刚刚开始进行抗 PD-1 疫苗的试验,以测试在动物系统中观察到的该抗体的预期效果也将在患者中看到的想法。这些观察结果支持这样一种观点,即动物临床前治疗实验是指导在患者中使用 T 细胞免疫检查点蛋白阻断进行试验的重要指南。尽管如此,临床研究人员必须灵活并准备好发现这些系统的生物学在人类和小鼠之间可能存在很大差异。