• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床研究中“持续同意”需求的实证评估。

Empirical evaluation of the need for 'on-going consent' in clinical research.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

AIDS. 2011 Jan 2;25(1):107-14. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328340fec7.

DOI:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328340fec7
PMID:21076272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2995831/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Some commentators argue that informed consent for clinical research should be an on-going process, which begins, rather than ends, with participants' initial consent. Lacking, however, are empirical data on whether there is a need for 'on-going consent'.

DESIGN

Two self-administered surveys - a baseline survey at initial consent and a follow-up survey 2-3 years later - to assess whether participants remain informed over time.

METHODS

Respondents were adults with HIV disease from Argentina, Brazil and Thailand enrolled in a long-term clinical trial.

RESULTS

Respondents overall were well informed at baseline. At follow-up, many reported being not informed about aspects of the study central to their on-going participation. With respect to the possibility of withdrawal, 38.5% of respondents at follow-up reported being 'not at all' informed. At follow-up, 71.1% wanted more information. Yet, 62.8% had not asked any questions during the entire study. Reasons for not asking questions included not having an opportunity (16.4%) and not knowing whom to ask (15.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The standard consent process resulted in participants being well informed at enrollment. Yet, this process was not sufficient to keep them informed about aspects of the study central to their on-going participation. In addition, participants who wanted more information often did not ask for it. These findings provide empirical support for recommendations that clinical trials should consider including a process of 'on-going consent'.

摘要

目的

一些评论员认为,临床研究的知情同意应该是一个持续的过程,这个过程应该从参与者最初的同意开始,而不是结束。然而,关于是否需要“持续同意”,缺乏实证数据。

设计

两次自我管理的调查——在最初同意时进行基线调查,在 2-3 年后进行随访调查——以评估参与者是否随着时间的推移保持知情。

方法

受访者是来自阿根廷、巴西和泰国的感染艾滋病毒的成年人,他们参加了一项长期临床试验。

结果

受访者总体上在基线时信息充分。在随访时,许多人报告说,他们对研究中与其持续参与相关的方面并不了解。关于退出的可能性,38.5%的受访者在随访时表示“完全不了解”。在随访时,71.1%的人希望获得更多信息。然而,62.8%的人在整个研究期间没有提出任何问题。不提问的原因包括没有机会(16.4%)和不知道向谁提问(15.5%)。

结论

标准的同意过程使参与者在入组时得到了充分的信息。然而,这个过程不足以让他们了解研究中与其持续参与相关的方面。此外,那些希望获得更多信息的参与者往往没有要求。这些发现为临床试验应考虑包括“持续同意”过程的建议提供了实证支持。

相似文献

1
Empirical evaluation of the need for 'on-going consent' in clinical research.临床研究中“持续同意”需求的实证评估。
AIDS. 2011 Jan 2;25(1):107-14. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328340fec7.
2
Are there adverse consequences of quizzing during informed consent for HIV research?在艾滋病毒研究的知情同意过程中进行提问是否会带来不良后果?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Nov;37(11):693-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2011.042358. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
3
Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC).随机对照试验中的知情同意:参与式和知情同意(PIC)测量方法的开发与初步评估
Trials. 2017 Jul 17;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2048-7.
4
A survey of study participants' understanding of informed consent to participate in a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture.一项关于研究参与者对参与针灸随机对照试验的知情同意理解情况的调查。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Jan 12;16:10. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0975-y.
5
Understanding and retention of trial-related information among participants in a clinical trial after completing the informed consent process.在完成知情同意程序后,临床试验参与者对试验相关信息的理解和记忆。
Clin Trials. 2014 Feb;11(1):70-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774513509316. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.随机对照试验知情同意干预措施评估(ELICIT):文献系统评价及使用德尔菲调查法确定核心结局集的方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 27;16:484. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1011-8.
7
Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria.尼日利亚乳腺癌基因流行病学研究中的自愿参与和知情同意理解情况
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 13;15:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-38.
8
Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.公众对随机对照试验中均衡性和随机化的理解。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(8):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9080.
9
Comparison of group counseling with individual counseling in the comprehension of informed consent: a randomized controlled trial.团体咨询与个体咨询在知情同意理解方面的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 May 14;11:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-8.
10
A survey of the opinions on 'informed consent' of women currently involved in clinical trials within a breast unit.一项关于乳腺科目前参与临床试验的女性对“知情同意”看法的调查。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1994 Dec;3(4):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1994.tb00037.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of central IRB's on informed consent readability and trial adherence in SPRINT.中央独立伦理委员会对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中知情同意书可读性及试验依从性的影响
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 6;15:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100407. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Volunteer experiences and perceptions of the informed consent process: Lessons from two HIV clinical trials in Uganda.志愿者的经历与对知情同意过程的看法:来自乌干达两项HIV临床试验的经验教训
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 3;16(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0073-1.
3
Research into a functional cure for HIV in neonates: the need for ethical foresight.新生儿HIV功能性治愈研究:伦理前瞻性的必要性。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;14(9):893-8. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70766-2. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
4
"I understood…but some parts were confusing and hard to grasp": Patients' perception of informed consent forms and clinical trials in Eldoret, Kenya.“我理解……但有些部分令人困惑且难以理解”:肯尼亚埃尔多雷特患者对知情同意书和临床试验的看法
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Jan;5(1):20-4. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.124563.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-consenting human subjects: ethical, legal and practical issues.重新征得人类受试者同意:伦理、法律及实际问题
J Med Ethics. 2009 Nov;35(11):656-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030338.
2
Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with HIV infection.白细胞介素-2疗法用于HIV感染患者。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1548-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903175.
3
Beyond the informed consent procedure: continuing consent in human research.超越知情同意程序:人类研究中的持续同意
Cien Saude Colet. 2008 Mar-Apr;13(2):381-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232008000200013.
4
Informed consent in the genomics era.基因组学时代的知情同意
PLoS Med. 2008 Sep 16;5(9):e192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050192.
5
The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research.精神分裂症研究中知情同意过程中额外保障措施的必要性。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Nov;33(11):647-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017376.
6
Informed consent for research obtained during the intensive care unit stay.在重症监护病房住院期间获得的研究知情同意书。
Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R170. doi: 10.1186/cc5120.
7
Improving the quality of consent to randomised controlled trials by using continuous consent and clinician training in the consent process.通过使用持续同意和在同意过程中对临床医生进行培训来提高随机对照试验的同意质量。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Aug;32(8):439-43. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013722.
8
The quality of informed consent in a clinical research study in Thailand.泰国一项临床研究中的知情同意质量。
IRB. 2005 Jan-Feb;27(1):9-17.
9
A method to reduce loss to follow-up in clinical trials: informed, withdrawal of consent.一种减少临床试验失访的方法:知情同意退出。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Jan;6(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eheart.2003.12.001.
10
Consent for participation in the Bloemfontein vitamin A trial: how informed and voluntary?参与布隆方丹维生素A试验的同意书:其知情程度和自愿程度如何?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):582-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.582.