Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1110-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1660-6. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
Using comprehensive gait analysis and strength testing, we previously investigated the early (2-month) functional outcome after THA using two-incision and mini-posterior surgical approaches and found an advantage for the mini-posterior approach. Benefits included improved muscle strength, a less antalgic gait, and better hip function as reflected by changes in hip moments during level walking and stair climbing. We questioned how these differences in function would fare with longer followup.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether the observed early functional advantages for the mini-posterior technique over the two-incision technique were still present 1 year postoperatively.
We prospectively enrolled 22 patients with primary degenerative arthritis of the hip; of these, 21 completed gait and strength testing at 2 months, and 19 completed comprehensive gait and strength testing at 1 year (11 two-incision hips, eight mini-posterior hips). The 19 patients included 11 men and eight women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 40-85 years) and a mean (BMI) of 29 (range, 21-39).
At 1 year postoperatively, the patients who had the mini-posterior THA had greater improvement in hip flexion strength and internal rotation strength, greater increase in hip flexor internal moment, and greater increase in single-leg stance time on level ground over the patients who had the two-incision THA.
Compared with the two-incision approach, patients undergoing mini-posterior THA had persistently better function, including hip flexor and internal rotator muscle strength, hip flexor internal moment, and single-leg stance during level walking.
Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
我们之前使用综合步态分析和力量测试研究了双切口和小后侧手术入路在全髋关节置换术后的早期(2 个月)功能结果,发现小后侧入路具有优势。其益处包括改善肌肉力量、减轻疼痛步态以及在水平行走和爬楼梯时髋关节力矩的变化反映出更好的髋关节功能。我们想知道这些功能差异在更长的随访时间中会如何表现。
问题/目的:我们确定小后侧技术相对于双切口技术在术后 1 年是否仍然存在早期观察到的功能优势。
我们前瞻性纳入了 22 例原发性髋关节退行性关节炎患者;其中 21 例在 2 个月时完成了步态和力量测试,19 例在 1 年时完成了全面的步态和力量测试(11 例双切口髋关节,8 例小后侧髋关节)。19 例患者中包括 11 名男性和 8 名女性,平均年龄 65 岁(范围 40-85 岁),平均 BMI 为 29(范围 21-39)。
术后 1 年,行小后侧全髋关节置换术的患者髋关节屈曲力量和内旋力量改善更大,髋关节屈肌内力矩增加更大,单腿站立时间在平地行走时增加更大。
与双切口入路相比,行小后侧全髋关节置换术的患者在髋关节屈肌和内旋肌力量、髋关节屈肌内力矩以及平地行走中单腿站立时间等方面的功能持续改善。
II 级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。