Suppr超能文献

护理专业学生的压力、应对方式和满意度。

Stress, coping and satisfaction in nursing students.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2011 Mar;67(3):621-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05495.x. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Abstract

AIM

This article is a report of a study conducted to explore the relationship between sources of stress and psychological well-being and to consider how different sources of stress and coping resources might function as moderators and mediators on well-being.

BACKGROUND

In most research exploring sources of stress and coping in nursing students, stress has been construed as psychological distress. Sources of stress likely to enhance well-being and, by implication, learning have not been considered.

METHOD

A questionnaire was administered to 171 final year nursing students in 2008. Questions were asked to measure sources of stress when rated as likely to contribute to distress (a hassle) and rated as likely to help one achieve (an uplift). Support, control, self-efficacy and coping style were also measured, along with their potential moderating and mediating effects on well-being, operationalized using the General Health Questionnaire and measures of course and career satisfaction.

FINDINGS

Sources of stress likely to lead to distress were more often predictors of well-being than were sources of stress likely to lead to positive, eustress states, with the exception of clinical placement demands. Self-efficacy, dispositional control and support were important predictors, and avoidance coping was the strongest predictor of adverse well-being. Approach coping was not a predictor of well-being. The mere presence of support appeared beneficial as well as the utility of that support to help a student cope.

CONCLUSION

Initiatives to promote support and self-efficacy are likely to have immediate benefits for student well-being. In course reviews, nurse educators need to consider how students' experiences might contribute not just to potential distress, but to eustress as well.

摘要

目的

本文是一项研究报告,旨在探讨压力源与心理健康之间的关系,并考虑不同的压力源和应对资源如何作为幸福感的调节和中介因素发挥作用。

背景

在大多数探索护理学生压力源和应对策略的研究中,压力被理解为心理困扰。然而,那些可能增强幸福感、进而促进学习的压力源并未得到考虑。

方法

2008 年,对 171 名护理专业大四学生进行了问卷调查。问题旨在衡量压力源,这些压力源被评定为可能导致困扰(麻烦)和可能有助于实现(提升)的程度。同时还测量了支持、控制、自我效能感和应对方式,以及它们对幸福感的潜在调节和中介作用,幸福感用一般健康问卷和课程满意度、职业满意度来衡量。

结果

导致困扰的压力源往往比导致积极的正性压力状态的压力源更能预测幸福感,除了临床实习需求。自我效能感、特质控制感和支持是重要的预测因素,回避应对是不良幸福感的最强预测因素。而趋近应对不是幸福感的预测因素。支持的存在本身就是有益的,而且支持对学生应对压力的作用也很有用。

结论

促进支持和自我效能感的举措可能会立即提高学生的幸福感。在课程评估中,护理教育者需要考虑学生的体验如何不仅可能导致潜在的困扰,而且还可能导致正性压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验