• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗电子病历(EPR)系统中药物信息的质量评估

Quality assessment of information about medications in primary care electronic patient record (EPR) systems.

作者信息

Pous Maria Font, Camporese Marco, Nobili Alessandro, Frau Serena, Del Zotti Francesco, Conforti Anita, Zimol Roberta, Giustetto Gudio, Zermiani Giulia, Lombardo Giuseppe, Mezzalira Luigi

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Department, Verona Local Health Authority, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Inform Prim Care. 2010;18(2):109-16. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v18i2.760.

DOI:10.14236/jhi.v18i2.760
PMID:21078233
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many different brands of primary care electronic patient record (EPR) software are available to general practitioners (GPs). Their ability to support GPs in improving prescribing varies greatly.

OBJECTIVE

To assess, using a ten-item tool, the quality of drug information provided by EPR software to support the appropriateness of prescriptions and to propose a list of quality standards for this type of application.

METHODS

The eight EPR programmes most used in general practice in Italy were assessed by a multidisciplinary team using the ten-item tool. The tool evaluated information on single drugs and drug safety and information on prescription rules in force.

RESULTS

Out of eight EPR programmes assessed, none scored more than 55% of the maximum possible score. Two achieved scores higher than 50%, one scored 48%, four ranged from 32% to 39% and one obtained 22%. Information on drug safety, such as the ability to detect interactions, to monitor laboratory parameters or to get updated information on drug safety was particularly limited. None of the eight EPR programmes contained drug information for patients, but two of them contained drug advertising.

CONCLUSIONS

This project highlighted the poor quality of drug information provided by these EPR programmes. The ten-item tool seems suitable for assessing their quality. Based on this analysis, we have proposed a set of ten quality standards for prescribing software.

摘要

背景

全科医生(GPs)可使用许多不同品牌的基层医疗电子病历(EPR)软件。它们在支持全科医生改善处方开具方面的能力差异很大。

目的

使用一个包含十个项目的工具,评估EPR软件提供的药物信息质量,以支持处方的合理性,并为此类应用提出一份质量标准清单。

方法

一个多学科团队使用该包含十个项目的工具,对意大利全科医疗中最常用的八个EPR程序进行了评估。该工具评估了单一药物和药物安全性信息以及现行处方规则信息。

结果

在评估的八个EPR程序中,没有一个得分超过最高分的55%。两个程序得分高于50%,一个得分为48%,四个在32%至39%之间,一个得分为22%。关于药物安全性的信息,如检测相互作用、监测实验室参数或获取药物安全性最新信息的能力特别有限。八个EPR程序中没有一个包含患者用药信息,但其中两个包含药品广告。

结论

该项目凸显了这些EPR程序提供的药物信息质量较差。这个包含十个项目的工具似乎适合评估它们的质量。基于此分析,我们提出了一套针对处方软件的十个质量标准。

相似文献

1
Quality assessment of information about medications in primary care electronic patient record (EPR) systems.基层医疗电子病历(EPR)系统中药物信息的质量评估
Inform Prim Care. 2010;18(2):109-16. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v18i2.760.
2
Applying preventable drug-related morbidity indicators to the electronic patient record in UK primary care: methodological development.将可预防的药物相关发病率指标应用于英国初级医疗保健中的电子病历:方法学发展
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006 Jun;31(3):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00723.x.
3
Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医疗中基层医疗人员对区域数据质量干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 26;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0445-8.
4
Collecting information on the quality of prescribing in primary care using semi-automatic data extraction from GPs' electronic medical records.利用从全科医生电子病历中进行半自动数据提取的方式,收集基层医疗中处方开具质量的信息。
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jun;74(5):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.02.004.
5
Electronic Patient Record data as proxy of GPs' thoughts.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;141:103-10.
6
A shared computer-based problem-oriented patient record for the primary care team.面向基层医疗团队的基于计算机的共享问题导向型患者记录。
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1663.
7
Electronic patient record systems and the general practitioner: an evaluation study.电子病历系统与全科医生:一项评估研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11 Suppl 2:S66-8. doi: 10.1258/135763305775124641.
8
Norwegians GPs' use of electronic patient record systems.挪威全科医生使用电子患者记录系统的情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Dec;78(12):808-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey.电子健康记录功能的使用与医疗质量之间的关系:全州范围调查的结果。
Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c16203.
10
Identification of features of electronic prescribing systems to support quality and safety in primary care using a modified Delphi process.采用改良 Delphi 法识别电子处方系统在初级保健中支持质量和安全的特征。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Apr 15;10:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Availability and quality of coronary heart disease family history in primary care medical records: implications for cardiovascular risk assessment.初级保健医疗记录中冠心病家族史的可获取性和质量:对心血管风险评估的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 9;9(1):e81998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081998. eCollection 2014.