Perkins P
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Feb;40(331):59-61.
All general ophthalmic services forms (GOS18) received by one practice over an 18 month period were analysed and the patient outcome after two years noted from the practice records. Sixty one forms were collected. Fifty patients (82%) were referred by the general practitioners to the local eye hospital. Among the 45 patients that have so far been seen by an ophthalmologist, 22 (49%) were diagnosed as having cataracts, eight (18%) macular degeneration and two (4%) glaucoma. Thirteen patients (29%) were found to have normal eyes. Nine of the 61 patients (15%) were not referred to an ophthalmologist and two patients (3%) were already under review at the eye hospital. It is concluded that some referrals to ophthalmologists might be avoided if general practitioners received improved training in ophthalmology, However, general practitioners remain an effective filter in the referral system between optometrists and ophthalmologists.
对一家诊所18个月内收到的所有普通眼科服务表格(GOS18)进行了分析,并从诊所记录中记录了两年后的患者结果。共收集到61份表格。50名患者(82%)由全科医生转诊至当地眼科医院。在目前已由眼科医生诊治的45名患者中,22名(49%)被诊断患有白内障,8名(18%)患有黄斑变性,2名(4%)患有青光眼。13名患者(29%)眼睛正常。61名患者中有9名(15%)未被转诊至眼科医生处,2名患者(3%)已在眼科医院接受复查。结论是,如果全科医生接受更好的眼科培训,可能会避免一些转诊至眼科医生的情况。然而,全科医生在验光师和眼科医生之间的转诊系统中仍然是一个有效的筛选环节。