Catalan Institute of Health and Physiotherapy Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza.
Clin Rehabil. 2011 Apr;25(4):339-48. doi: 10.1177/0269215510385480. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
To describe the immediate effects of diacutaneous fibrolysis on pain and mobility in patients suffering from painful shoulder, and to assess the ability of the placebo technique to blind participants to group allocation.
A double-blind before-after randomized placebo-controlled pilot study.
Two public centres of Primary Health Care of the Spanish National Health System.
Fifty patients (29 women, 21 men) with a diagnosis of painful shoulder of subacromial origin were included.
Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The intervention group (N = 25) was actually treated with diacutaneous fibrolysis, while the placebo group (N = 25) was treated with placebo diacutaneous fibrolysis.
Active range of motion (flexion, abduction, extension, external and internal rotation) and pain intensity in the hand-behind-back position were measured. Participants were also asked about their perception in terms of comfort of the technique and results obtained.
Between-groups differences were significant in flexion (mean 11.4 degrees; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-17.1), abduction (mean 7.2 degrees; 95% CI 2.0-12.5) and internal rotation movements (mean 3.1 cm; 95% CI 0.1-6.1). There were no significant differences between groups in pain intensity, extension or external rotation movements. The placebo technique showed its ability to blind participants to group allocation. None of the participants suffered any adverse effects from diacutaneous fibrolysis.
Diacutaneous fibrolysis may be an effective and safe therapeutic option to improve active range of motion in patients suffering from painful shoulder.
描述皮内切开纤维松解术对肩部疼痛和活动度的即刻影响,并评估安慰剂技术对参与者分组的盲法效果。
双盲前后随机安慰剂对照的初步研究。
西班牙国家卫生系统的两个公共初级保健中心。
50 名(29 名女性,21 名男性)肩部疼痛的患者,诊断为肩峰下起源的疼痛。
参与者随机分配到两组之一。干预组(n=25)实际接受皮内切开纤维松解术治疗,而安慰剂组(n=25)接受安慰剂皮内切开纤维松解术治疗。
测量主动活动范围(前屈、外展、伸展、外旋和内旋)和手后位的疼痛强度。还询问了参与者对技术舒适度和获得结果的感知。
组间差异在伸展(平均 11.4 度;95%置信区间 5.7-17.1)、外展(平均 7.2 度;95%置信区间 2.0-12.5)和内旋运动(平均 3.1cm;95%置信区间 0.1-6.1)方面有统计学意义。两组在疼痛强度、伸展或外旋运动方面无显著差异。安慰剂技术显示出其将参与者对分组的盲法效果。没有参与者因皮内切开纤维松解术而遭受任何不良反应。
皮内切开纤维松解术可能是一种有效且安全的治疗选择,可以改善肩部疼痛患者的主动活动范围。