Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Dec;48(3-4):341-51. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9363-4.
The current study examined the community characteristics and migration of chronically homeless adults before and after entry into a multi-site supported housing initiative. A total of 394 participants were geocoded at baseline and 12-month follow up. Data from geographic information systems indicate that the median distance participants traveled from their last residence to their residence 1 year after program entry was 4.6 miles and 12% of participants traveled more than 100 miles. Participants moved into communities with higher population densities, larger proportions of Whites, and smaller proportions of Blacks following their entry into supported housing, but continued to live in communities with higher crime rates, lower education levels, and lower income levels then the state average. At 12 months, Black participants residing in communities with higher population densities and larger Black populations reported higher social support and lower subjective distress. This underscores the importance of considering client preferences in housing. Together, these findings suggest that supported housing programs may be successful in finding housing for homeless clients, but are not placing them in improved communities. Special attention may also be needed for some clients who travel long distances between residences.
本研究考察了慢性无家可归成年人在进入多地点支持性住房倡议前后的社区特征和迁移情况。共有 394 名参与者在基线和 12 个月随访时进行了地理编码。地理信息系统的数据表明,参与者从最后住所到项目进入后 1 年住所的中位数距离为 4.6 英里,12%的参与者的行程超过 100 英里。参与者在进入支持性住房后搬入了人口密度更高、白人比例更大、黑人比例更小的社区,但仍居住在犯罪率更高、教育水平更低、收入水平低于州平均水平的社区。在 12 个月时,居住在人口密度较高和黑人比例较大的社区的黑人参与者报告说,他们的社会支持更高,主观困扰更低。这突显了在住房方面考虑客户偏好的重要性。总之,这些发现表明,支持性住房计划可能在为无家可归者寻找住房方面取得了成功,但并没有将他们安置在改善后的社区中。对于一些在住所之间长途旅行的客户,可能还需要特别关注。