University Rovira i Virgili, Primary Healthcare Centre Jaume I, Tarragona, Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Jan;66(1):210-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq416. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
to evaluate the effect of two interventions on reducing antibiotic prescription in pharyngitis.
a prospective, non-randomized, before-after controlled study was carried out in primary care centres throughout Spain. General practitioners (GPs) registered all cases of pharyngitis during a 3 week period before and after two types of intervention in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Full intervention consisted of discussion sessions of the results of the first registry, courses for GPs, guidelines, patient information leaflets, workshops on rapid tests and the use of rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) in their consulting offices. The physicians in the partial intervention group underwent all the above intervention except for the workshop, and RADTs were not provided. A control group was also included in 2009. Multilevel logistic regression was performed considering the prescription of antibiotics as the dependent variable.
a total of 280 GPs registered cases with pharyngitis (70 partial intervention and 210 full intervention). Fifty-nine new physicians were included as a control group. A total of 6849 episodes of pharyngitis were registered. Antibiotic prescription was significantly lower after intervention for the full intervention group, but not for the partial intervention group. According to the multivariate model, in comparison with the control group, the odds ratio of antibiotic prescription after the intervention was 0.52 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.23-1.18] in the partial intervention group and 0.23 (95% CI 0.11-0.47) in the full intervention group.
intervention was beneficial for reducing the prescription of antibiotics, but was only statistically significant when the GPs were provided with RADTs.
评估两种干预措施对减少咽炎抗生素处方的效果。
这是一项在西班牙各地初级保健中心开展的前瞻性、非随机、前后对照研究。全科医生(GP)在 2008 年和 2009 年分别在两次干预前的 3 周和干预后的 3 周期间登记了所有咽炎病例。全干预包括讨论第一次登记的结果、为 GP 举办课程、制定指南、为患者提供信息传单、关于快速检测及其在诊室中使用快速抗原检测(RADT)的研讨会。部分干预组的医生接受了上述所有干预措施,但不包括研讨会,也不提供 RADT。2009 年还包括了一个对照组。多水平逻辑回归考虑抗生素处方作为因变量。
共有 280 名 GP 登记了咽炎病例(70 名部分干预和 210 名全干预)。有 59 名新医生作为对照组纳入。共登记了 6849 例咽炎。全干预组干预后抗生素处方明显减少,但部分干预组无明显减少。根据多变量模型,与对照组相比,部分干预组干预后抗生素处方的比值比为 0.52(95%置信区间 95%CI 0.23-1.18),全干预组为 0.23(95%CI 0.11-0.47)。
干预措施有利于减少抗生素的处方,但只有当为 GP 提供 RADT 时才具有统计学意义。