Dhillon Inderpreet, Pitman Martha B, Demay Richard M, Archuletta Pamela, Shidham Vinod B
Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI.
Cytojournal. 2010 Oct 18;7:23. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.71741.
The confusion centered around appropriate use of the CPT billing code 88172 is addressed in the commentary from the Economic and Government Affairs Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) who have written a timely commentary in this issue of Cytojournal, "Adequate Reimbursement is Crucial to Support Cost-Effective Rapid Onsite Cytopathology Evaluations". Currently, lack of standardized use within and between pathology departments is stirring unhealthy practices of denying reimbursements for this critical and legitimate cytopathology service. This editorial discusses the important concerns raised in this commentary and recommends immediate corrective action. (See also Al-Abbadi MA, et al. Adequate reimbursement is crucial to support cost-effective rapid on-site cytopathology evaluations. CytoJournal 2010;7:22).
美国细胞病理学会(ASC)经济与政府事务委员会在本期《细胞病理学杂志》上发表的一篇及时评论《充足的报销对支持具有成本效益的快速现场细胞病理学评估至关重要》中,解决了围绕CPT计费代码88172的合理使用所产生的困惑。目前,病理科内部和之间缺乏标准化使用,引发了拒绝为这项关键且合理的细胞病理学服务报销的不良做法。这篇社论讨论了该评论中提出的重要问题,并建议立即采取纠正措施。(另见Al-Abbadi MA等人的《充足的报销对支持具有成本效益的快速现场细胞病理学评估至关重要》。《细胞病理学杂志》2010年;7:22)