Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下细针抽吸现场细胞学检查的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver concordance for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration on-site cytopathology.

机构信息

Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Endosc Ultrasound. 2014 Apr;3(Suppl 1):S15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an accurate method of diagnosing and staging gastrointestinal and thoracic malignancy. A key issue in maximizing FNA accuracy is to ensure that an adequate specimen is obtained. On-site cytopathology increases the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA. However, this increases the time and costs. Physicians trained in EUS and in pathology are capable of interpreting cytologic adequacy from EUS-FNA specimens. Furthermore, on-site interpretation by the endoscopist could reduce cost and procedure duration. The learning curve of endossonographers in on-site cytopathology and how they could contribute in EUS-FNA accuracy increase is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the interobserver concordance of on-site cytopathology interpretation of EUS-FNA specimens by comparing endosonographers trained in cytology with a physician cytopathologist.

METHODS

A prospective blinded study comparing one endossonographer with one physician cytopathologist. The study was developed in the Santa Casa Medical School, Brazil from February to November 2012. Fifteen different cases of EUS-FNA were analysed, in a total of 50 slides. Each observer described the slides for the adequate or not of tissue sampling, and classified as benign, suspicious, malign or undefined. The analyses were then matched.

RESULTS

We analyzed the concordance of 50 slides description made by the endossonographer and physician cytopathologist, according to enough material, cellular group identification and final diagnosis. Kappa (κ) indexes were: Presence of material κ = 0.480 (P < 0.001); presence of malignance κ = 0.808 (P < 0.001); in subepithelial lesions κ = 0.615 (P = 0.06); in pancreatic lesions κ = 0.675 (P < 0.001); in mediastinal lesions κ = 0.243 (P = 0.128).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that endosonographers and cytopathologists had good concordance in EUS-FNA specimens on-site cytopathology interpretation, except in mediastinal/pulmonary cases.

摘要

简介

内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)是一种准确诊断和分期胃肠道和胸部恶性肿瘤的方法。最大限度地提高 FNA 准确性的一个关键问题是确保获得足够的标本。现场细胞学检查可提高 EUS-FNA 的诊断率。然而,这会增加时间和成本。经过 EUS 和病理学培训的医生能够从 EUS-FNA 标本中解读细胞学的充分性。此外,内镜医生进行现场解读可以降低成本和缩短手术时间。内镜超声医师在现场细胞学方面的学习曲线以及他们如何提高 EUS-FNA 准确性的情况尚不清楚。

目的

通过比较接受过细胞学培训的内镜超声医师与病理医师,确定 EUS-FNA 标本现场细胞学解读的观察者间一致性。

方法

一项前瞻性盲法研究,比较一名内镜超声医师和一名病理医师。该研究于 2012 年 2 月至 11 月在巴西圣家医学院进行。分析了 15 例不同的 EUS-FNA 病例,共 50 张幻灯片。每位观察者描述了用于评估组织取样是否充分的幻灯片,并将其分类为良性、可疑、恶性或未定义。然后对分析结果进行匹配。

结果

我们分析了内镜超声医师和病理医师对 50 张幻灯片描述的一致性,根据材料的存在、细胞群的识别和最终诊断进行判断。Kappa(κ)指数为:存在材料κ=0.480(P<0.001);存在恶性κ=0.808(P<0.001);在黏膜下病变中κ=0.615(P=0.06);在胰腺病变中κ=0.675(P<0.001);在纵隔病变中κ=0.243(P=0.128)。

结论

我们的研究表明,内镜超声医师和病理医师在 EUS-FNA 标本现场细胞学解读方面具有良好的一致性,除了纵隔/肺部病例。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验