• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的生存比较:一项荟萃分析。

Survival after anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, 200032 Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Jun;56(6):1626-33. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1482-0. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-010-1482-0
PMID:21082347
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect on survival of anatomic resection (AR) versus nonanatomic resection (NAR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from all published comparative studies in the literature.

METHODS

Databases, including Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Web of Science, were searched to identify studies comparing AR with NAR for HCC. In this meta-analysis, primary end points were the overall survival and disease-free survival; the secondary end point was local recurrence rate. The meta-analysis was performed by use of RevMan 4.2.

RESULTS

Nine comparative studies comprising 1,503 patients (833 AR and 670 NAR) were identified. In the combined results, disease-free survival was significantly higher in the AR group than in the NAR group (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.22-2.59, P = 0.003; heterogeneity P = 0.08). Overall survival (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.92-1.85, P = 0.13; heterogeneity P = 0.04) did not suggest any significant difference between AR and NAR. No statistically significant difference was found for local recurrence rate between the two resection methods (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.25-1.23, P = 0.15; heterogeneity P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic resection is associated with better disease-free survival than nonanatomic resection. Because heterogeneity was detected, caution is needed in interpretation of the results. Better designed, adequately powered studies are required to address this issue.

摘要

背景与目的

比较所有已发表的文献中比较解剖性肝切除术(AR)与非解剖性肝切除术(NAR)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的生存效果。

方法

检索 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Ovid 和 Web of Science 等数据库,以确定比较 AR 与 NAR 治疗 HCC 的研究。本荟萃分析的主要终点为总生存时间和无病生存时间;次要终点为局部复发率。使用 RevMan 4.2 进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 9 项比较研究,包括 1503 例患者(833 例 AR 和 670 例 NAR)。综合结果显示,AR 组的无病生存率明显高于 NAR 组(OR 1.78,95%CI 1.22-2.59,P = 0.003;异质性 P = 0.08)。总生存时间(OR 1.31,95%CI 0.92-1.85,P = 0.13;异质性 P = 0.04)提示 AR 与 NAR 之间无显著差异。两种切除方法的局部复发率无统计学差异(OR 0.55,95%CI 0.25-1.23,P = 0.15;异质性 P = 0.010)。

结论

与非解剖性肝切除术相比,解剖性肝切除术可获得更好的无病生存时间。由于存在异质性,对结果的解释需谨慎。需要设计更好、样本量更大的研究来解决这一问题。

相似文献

1
Survival after anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的生存比较:一项荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Jun;56(6):1626-33. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1482-0. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
2
Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, do we have an answer? A meta-analysis.解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌,我们有答案吗?一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 Aug;80:243-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Meta-analysis of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;396(7):1109-17. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0784-9. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Efficacy and safety of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis.肝细胞癌患者解剖性切除与非解剖性切除的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186930. eCollection 2017.
5
Recurrence after anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.肝细胞癌解剖性切除与非解剖性切除术后复发情况的Meta分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):1771-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.5.1771.
6
Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):927-938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
A Meta-analysis comparing the effect of anatomical resection vs. non-anatomical resection on the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.一项比较解剖性切除与非解剖性切除对肝细胞癌肝切除患者长期预后影响的荟萃分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Oct;19(10):843-849. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
A comprehensive meta-regression analysis on outcome of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌结局的全面荟萃回归分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3697-705. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2450-z. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
9
Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma.肝硬化早期肝细胞癌患者的解剖性切除与非解剖性切除
Surgery. 2014 Mar;155(3):512-21. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Comparison of anatomic and non-anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017 Nov;24(11):616-626. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.502. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Comparison of Surgical Margins and Type of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion.《伴有微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌的手术切缘与肝切除类型比较》
Oncologist. 2023 Nov 2;28(11):e1043-e1051. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad124.
2
Detailed analysis of recurrent sites after wedge resection for primary hepatocellular carcinoma considering the potential usefulness of anatomic resection: a retrospective cohort study.针对原发性肝细胞癌楔形切除术后复发部位的详细分析,考虑到解剖性切除术的潜在有用性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 14;408(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02775-x.
3
Comparison of Anatomic and Non-Anatomic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of anatomic resection vs nonanatomic resection for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma based on gross classification.基于大体分类的小肿块型肝细胞癌解剖性切除与非解剖性切除的疗效比较
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(5):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1312-8. Epub 2008 Oct 4.
2
Anatomic versus limited nonanatomic resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.孤立性肝细胞癌的解剖性切除与有限的非解剖性切除
Surgery. 2008 May;143(5):607-15. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.01.006.
3
Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey.
解剖性与非解剖性肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 19;58(9):1305. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091305.
4
What is the optimal surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the debate between anatomical versus non-anatomical resection?除了解剖性与非解剖性肝切除之争外,肝细胞癌的最佳手术治疗方法是什么?
Surg Today. 2022 Jun;52(6):871-880. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02352-z. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
Anatomical versus Non-anatomical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Microscope Vascular Invasion: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.显微镜下血管侵犯的肝细胞癌解剖性切除与非解剖性切除:倾向评分匹配分析
J Cancer. 2019 Jul 5;10(17):3950-3957. doi: 10.7150/jca.32592. eCollection 2019.
6
Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma ⁻ a Multidisciplinary Approach.肝细胞癌的治疗策略 ⁇ 多学科方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 22;20(6):1465. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061465.
7
Surgical resection of localized hepatocellular carcinoma: patient selection and special consideration.局限性肝细胞癌的手术切除:患者选择及特殊考量
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2016 Dec 28;4:1-9. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S96085. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparison of Anatomical and Nonanatomical Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis of 5207 Patients.解剖性肝切除术与非解剖性肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较:一项 5207 例患者的荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 31;6:32304. doi: 10.1038/srep32304.
9
Clinical factors that affect the outcomes after anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.影响肝细胞癌解剖性切除与非解剖性切除术后结局的临床因素。
Surg Today. 2017 Feb;47(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1397-2. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Impact of operative and peri-operative factors on the long-term prognosis of primary liver cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy.手术及围手术期因素对接受肝切除术的原发性肝癌患者长期预后的影响。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016 Aug;36(4):523-528. doi: 10.1007/s11596-016-1619-2. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
基于日本全国性调查的单发性肝细胞癌解剖性亚段切除术与非解剖性小肝切除术的疗效比较
Surgery. 2008 Apr;143(4):469-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.12.003.
4
Longterm favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience.肝细胞癌患者行局限性肝切除术的长期良好结果:20年经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.069.
5
Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma detected after successful interferon therapy.干扰素治疗成功后检测出的肝细胞癌的手术治疗
Surg Today. 2007;37(4):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3403-6. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
6
Trends in morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: an institute's experience with 625 patients.肝细胞癌肝切除术后的发病率和死亡率趋势:一家机构对625例患者的经验
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):580-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.035.
7
Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma.解剖性切除可独立提高T1-T2期肝细胞癌患者的长期生存率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1356-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9318-z. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
8
Improved long-term survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the modern era: retrospective study from HCV-endemic areas.现代时代肝细胞癌肝切除术后长期生存率的提高:来自丙型肝炎病毒流行地区的回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1567-78. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0249-9.
9
Comparison of limited and anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C.丙型肝炎相关性肝细胞癌有限肝切除与解剖性肝切除的比较
Surgery. 2006 Mar;139(3):385-94. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.035.
10
Systematic hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea.韩国小肝细胞癌的系统性肝切除术
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):365-70. doi: 10.1007/s00534-005-1002-3.