Tasker Robert C, Fleming Thomas J, Young Amber Er, Morris Kevin P, Parslow Roger C
Department of Paediatrics, Cambridge University Clinical School, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;25(1):68-77. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2010.538770. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
To explore the relationship between volume of paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) head injury (HI) admissions, specialist paediatric neurosurgical PICU practice, and mortality in England and Wales.
Analysis of HI cases (age <16 years) from the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network national cohort of sequential PICU admissions in 27 units in England and Wales, in the 5 years 2004-2008. Risk-adjusted mortality using the Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) model was compared between PICUs aggregated into quartile groups, first to fourth based on descending number of HI admissions/year: highest volume, medium-higher volume, medium-lower volume, and lowest volume. The effect of category of PICU interventions - observation only, mechanical ventilation (MV) only, and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring - on outcome was also examined. Observations were reported in relation to specialist paediatric neurosurgical PICU practice.
There were 2575 admissions following acute HI (4.4% of non-cardiac surgery PICU admissions in England and Wales). PICU mortality was 9.3%. Units in the fourth-quartile (lowest volume) group did not have significant specialist paediatric neurosurgical activity on the PICU; the other groups did. Overall, there was no effect of HI admissions by individual PICU on risk-adjusted mortality. However, there were significant effects for both intensive care intervention category (p<0.001) and HI admissions by grouping (p<0.005). Funnel plots and control charts using the PIM model showed a hierarchy in increasing performance from lowest volume (group IV), to medium-higher volume (group II), to highest volume (group I), to medium-lower volume (group III) sectors of the health care system.
The health care system in England and Wales for critically ill HI children requiring PICU admission performs as expected in relation to the PIM model. However, the lowest-volume sector, comprising 14 PICUs with little or no paediatric neurosurgical activity on the unit, exhibits worse than expected outcome, particularly in those undergoing ICP monitoring. The best outcomes are seen in units in the mid-volume sector. These data do not support the hypothesis that there is a simple relationship between PICU volume and performance.
探讨英格兰和威尔士儿科重症监护病房(PICU)头部损伤(HI)入院量、儿科专科神经外科PICU实践与死亡率之间的关系。
对2004 - 2008年期间英格兰和威尔士27个单位的儿科重症监护审计网络全国连续性PICU入院队列中的HI病例(年龄<16岁)进行分析。根据每年HI入院数量从高到低将PICU分为四分位组,即最高入院量组、中高入院量组、中低入院量组和最低入院量组,比较使用儿科死亡率指数(PIM)模型调整后的风险死亡率。还研究了PICU干预类别(仅观察、仅机械通气(MV)和颅内压(ICP)监测)对结局的影响。观察结果与儿科专科神经外科PICU实践相关。
急性HI后有2575例入院(占英格兰和威尔士非心脏手术PICU入院的4.4%)。PICU死亡率为9.3%。第四四分位组(最低入院量组)的单位在PICU没有显著的儿科专科神经外科活动;其他组有。总体而言,单个PICU的HI入院量对调整风险后的死亡率没有影响。然而,重症监护干预类别(p<0.001)和分组后的HI入院量(p<0.005)都有显著影响。使用PIM模型的漏斗图和控制图显示,医疗保健系统从最低入院量组(第四组)到中高入院量组(第二组),再到最高入院量组(第一组),最后到中低入院量组(第三组),绩效呈递增层次。
英格兰和威尔士针对需要入住PICU的重症HI儿童的医疗保健系统在PIM模型方面表现符合预期。然而,最低入院量组,包括14个在单位内几乎没有或没有儿科神经外科活动的PICU,其结局比预期更差,特别是在那些接受ICP监测的患者中。最佳结局出现在中入院量组的单位。这些数据不支持PICU入院量与绩效之间存在简单关系的假设。