South Australian Research and Development Institute, Food Safety Research Program, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Nov;57 Suppl 1:16-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01359.x.
A decontamination trial on the effectiveness of hot water or acidified sodium chlorite (SANOVA) treatment on Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli and Total Viable Count (TVC) was undertaken on pork carcases prior to primary chilling in two large pork abattoirs in Australia using belly-strip excision sampling. A total of 123 samples from Abattoir A and 400 samples from Abattoir B were cultured and analysed. Test pigs were selected from herds with a known high level of on-farm Salmonella infection. At Abattoir A, Salmonella spp. were not isolated from carcases. The prevalence of E. coli on control carcases was 92.9% compared with 9.8% for hot water and 12.5% for SANOVA treated carcases. The mean log(10) E. coli concentration for control carcases was 0.89 cfu/gram, compared with -0.83 cfu/gram from hot water and -0.75 cfu/gram from SANOVA treated carcases. The mean log(10) TVC for control carcases was 4.06 compared with 1.81 cfu/gram for hot water and 2.76 cfu/gram for SANOVA treated carcases. At Abattoir B, the prevalence of Salmonella on control carcases was 16% compared with 2.7% for hot water and 7.0% for SANOVA treated carcases. The prevalence of E. coli on control carcases was 69.3% compared with 22% for hot water and 30% for SANOVA treated carcases. The mean log(10) E. coli concentration for control carcases was 0.45 cfu/gram, compared with -0.65 cfu/gram from hot water and -0.60 cfu/gram from SANOVA treated carcases. The mean log(10) TVC for control carcases was 3.00 cfu/gram compared with 2.10 cfu/gram for hot water and 2.53 cfu/gram for SANOVA treated carcases. The reductions in prevalence and mean log(10) concentrations in the present trial were all found to be statistically significant and indicate that carcases decontamination with either hot water or SANOVA are effective risk management options immediately available to the pork industry.
在澳大利亚的两个大型猪肉屠宰场,使用腹部带皮切割采样,对猪肉屠体进行了热水或酸化亚氯酸钠(SANOVA)处理对沙门氏菌 spp.、大肠杆菌和总活菌计数(TVC)的有效性的去污试验。从屠宰场 A 采集了 123 个样本,从屠宰场 B 采集了 400 个样本进行培养和分析。试验猪从已知农场沙门氏菌感染水平较高的畜群中选择。在屠宰场 A,未从屠体中分离到沙门氏菌。对照屠体中大肠杆菌的流行率为 92.9%,而热水处理组为 9.8%,SANOVA 处理组为 12.5%。对照屠体中大肠杆菌的平均对数(10)浓度为 0.89 cfu/克,而热水处理组为-0.83 cfu/克,SANOVA 处理组为-0.75 cfu/克。对照屠体中总活菌计数的平均对数(10)为 4.06,而热水处理组为 1.81 cfu/克,SANOVA 处理组为 2.76 cfu/克。在屠宰场 B,对照屠体中沙门氏菌的流行率为 16%,而热水处理组为 2.7%,SANOVA 处理组为 7.0%。对照屠体中大肠杆菌的流行率为 69.3%,而热水处理组为 22%,SANOVA 处理组为 30%。对照屠体中大肠杆菌的平均对数(10)浓度为 0.45 cfu/克,而热水处理组为-0.65 cfu/克,SANOVA 处理组为-0.60 cfu/克。对照屠体中总活菌计数的平均对数(10)为 3.00 cfu/克,而热水处理组为 2.10 cfu/克,SANOVA 处理组为 2.53 cfu/克。本试验中,患病率和平均对数(10)浓度的降低均具有统计学意义,表明热水或 SANOVA 处理屠体是猪肉行业目前可立即采用的有效风险管理选择。