Salit M L, Travis J C, Winchester M R
Appl Opt. 1996 Jun 1;35(16):2960-70. doi: 10.1364/AO.35.002960.
The intrinsic wavelength scale in a modern reference laser-controlled Michelson interferometer-sometimes referred to as the Connes advantage-offers excellent wavelength accuracy with relative ease. Truly superb wavelength accuracy, with total relative uncertainty in line position of the order of several parts in 10(8), should be within reach with single-point, multiplicative calibration. The need for correction of the wavelength scale arises from two practical effects: the use of a finite aperture, from which off-axis rays propagate through the interferometer, and imperfect geometric alignment of the sample beam with the reference beam and the optical axis of the moving mirror. Although an analytical correction can be made for the finite-aperture effect, calibration with a trusted wavelength standard is typically used to accomplish both corrections. Practical aspects of accurate calibration of an interferometer in the UV-visible region are discussed. Critical issues regarding accurate use of a standard external to the sample source and the evaluation and selection of an appropriate standard are addressed. Anomalous results for two different potential wavelength standards measured by Fabry-Perot interferometry (Ar II and (198)Hg I) are observed.
现代参考激光控制的迈克尔逊干涉仪中的固有波长标度——有时被称为康奈斯优势——相对容易地提供了出色的波长精度。通过单点乘法校准,有望实现真正卓越的波长精度,谱线位置的总相对不确定度达到10的8次方分之几的量级。波长标度的校正需求源于两个实际效应:使用有限孔径,离轴光线从该孔径传播通过干涉仪;以及样品光束与参考光束以及移动镜光轴的几何对准不完善。尽管可以对有限孔径效应进行解析校正,但通常使用可靠的波长标准进行校准来完成这两种校正。讨论了紫外可见区域干涉仪精确校准的实际问题。解决了有关准确使用样品源外部标准以及评估和选择合适标准的关键问题。观察到通过法布里-珀罗干涉测量法测量的两种不同潜在波长标准(Ar II和(198)Hg I)的异常结果。